Jump to content

Mushkin 3dmark Contest Comments Thread


Bosco

Recommended Posts

Guest ajmatson

Results are not valid unless approved drivers are used.

 

Only because the drivers are to new to be evaluated by FM.

HWBot has accepted scores with the new drivers so far.

That is why we want to know if Bosco is going to allow them or not. Half of the people are using older 3DMark versions as well. We need an official Yes or no that's all :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Run 3DMark06 at default settings:

1. You must submit your score to 3DMark for it to be valid and post your validation link.

2. You must show a CPU-Z and GPU-Z screen shot along with your 3DMark score.

3. You must show the date and your forum user name in your screenshot as well.

4. List your system specs in your post below or above your screen shot or include it in your screenshot.

 

It's rule #1, break any of the rules and you will be disqualified. I really don't understand why it is so hard for so many people to follow 4 simple steps.

Anyway, the list above, is not OCC aproved, it's just me not having anything better to do with my time.

Edited by Sihastru

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the ordered one:

 

USER;3DMARKS;VER;INFO

visagepoissons;n/a;n/a;invalid - bad link

visagepoissons;n/a;n/a;invalid - bad link

road-runner;32037;1.2.0;valid

Lhiannon;31328;1.2.0;valid

wevsspot;30049;1.2.0;valid

Water_Hazard;29777;1.2.0;valid

endorphiend;28811;1.2.0;valid

thedon3k;28557;1.2.0;invalid - bad driver

Fieldsy;27291;1.1.0;invalid - bad version

Sihastru;27241;1.2.0;valid

marty12345n;25702;1.1.0;invalid - bad version

Tacobell;25055;n/a;invalid - bad link

Llucid311;24655;1.2.0;valid

ajmatson;24308;1.2.0;invalid - bad driver

Dariuas;24214;n/a;invalid - bad link

Nightmaresiege;23665;1.2.0;valid

osmt2;22683;n/a;invalid - bad link

hornybluecow;22427;1.2.0;valid

GodlyManDude540;22203;n/a;invalid - bad link

MJCRO;22069;1.2.0;valid

t0asty;21472;n/a;invalid - no link

sebastc09;21431;n/a;invalid - private

k1e1v1i1n;20582;1.2.0;valid

Lugia0529;20047;1.2.0;valid

MercuryDoun;19642;1.2.0;valid

aaron6581230;19034;1.2.0;valid

zonik_mazter;18898;1.2.0;valid

waco;18600;1.2.0;valid

slick2500;18220;1.2.0;valid

BluePanda;18090;1.2.0;invalid - score mismatch

F13Bubba;17108;1.2.0;valid

tcath2o;17038;n/a;invalid - no link

Utmost;16512;n/a;invalid - bad link

Munkypoo7;16141;1.2.0;valid

viperk1;15575;1.2.0;valid

tkrow21;15343;n/a;invalid - private

ClayMeow;14940;1.2.0;valid

Andrewr05;14880;n/a;invalid - private

Krazyxazn;14672;n/a;invalid - no link

werty316;14158;1.1.0;invalid - bad version

damian;14064;n/a;invalid - deleted

joel.monteiro;13247;invalid - bad link

UT66;12059;n/a;invalid - no link

imMune;11850;n/a;invalud - bad link

Spectrascope;9800;n/a;invalid - bad link

doopypeanut;9495;n/a;invalid - bad link

Deathmineral;9032;n/a;invalid - bad link

betauser;2035;n/a;invalid - bad link

Bosco;22449;n/a;n/a

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only because the drivers are to new to be evaluated by FM.

HWBot has accepted scores with the new drivers so far.

That is why we want to know if Bosco is going to allow them or not. Half of the people are using older 3DMark versions as well. We need an official Yes or no that's all :)

 

I can understand you wanting to allow unapproved drivers (though the requirements do state that validation links are required), but there is no way older versions of 3DMark should be allowed, as scores can not truly be compared across versions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...