Mushkin 3dmark Contest Comments Thread

[ClayMeow]

mine is marked invalid due to a score mismatch...

 

My guess is your screen shot and validation link don't match.

[Nightmaresiege]

mine is marked invalid due to a score mismatch...

 

Oh your screenshot doesn't match your link, just checked . Should be an easy fix. Link says your score is lower.

Edited August 29, 2010 by Nightmaresiege

[The Smith]

Wow the thread is pretty active.

 

Here is a new one with the positions this time. I also removed the n/a scores and Bosco:

 

USER;3DMARKS;VER;INFO

1;road-runner;32037;1.2.0;valid

2;Lhiannon;31328;1.2.0;valid

3;wevsspot;30049;1.2.0;valid

4;Water_Hazard;29777;1.2.0;valid

5;endorphiend;28811;1.2.0;valid

6;thedon3k;28557;1.2.0;invalid - bad driver

7;Fieldsy;27291;1.1.0;invalid - bad version

8;Sihastru;27241;1.2.0;valid

9;marty12345n;25702;1.1.0;invalid - bad version

10;Nightmaresiege;25665;1.2.0;valid

11;Tacobell;25055;n/a;invalid - bad link

12;Llucid311;24655;1.2.0;valid

13;ajmatson;24308;1.2.0;invalid - bad driver

14;Dariuas;24214;n/a;invalid - bad link

15;osmt2;22683;n/a;invalid - bad link

16;Bosco;22449;n/a;n/a

17;hornybluecow;22427;1.2.0;valid

18;GodlyManDude540;22203;n/a;invalid - bad link

19;MJCRO;22069;1.2.0;valid

20;t0asty;21472;n/a;invalid - no link

21;sebastc09;21431;n/a;invalid - private

22;k1e1v1i1n;20582;1.2.0;valid

23;Lugia0529;20047;1.2.0;valid

24;MercuryDoun;19642;1.2.0;valid

25;aaron6581230;19034;1.2.0;valid

26;zonik_mazter;18898;1.2.0;valid

27;waco;18600;1.2.0;valid

28;slick2500;18220;1.2.0;valid

29;BluePanda;18090;1.2.0;valid

30;F13Bubba;17108;1.2.0;valid

31;tcath2o;17038;n/a;invalid - no link

32;Utmost;16512;n/a;invalid - bad link

33;Munkypoo7;16141;1.2.0;valid

34;viperk1;15575;1.2.0;valid

35;tkrow21;15343;n/a;invalid - private

36;Hemidare;15144;n/a;invalid - no link

37;ClayMeow;14940;1.2.0;valid

38;Andrewr05;14880;n/a;invalid - private

39;Krazyxazn;14672;n/a;invalid - no link

40;werty316;14158;1.1.0;invalid - bad version

41;damian;14064;n/a;invalid - deleted

42;joel.monteiro;13247;invalid - bad link

43;UT66;12059;n/a;invalid - no link

44;imMune;11850;n/a;invalud - bad link

45;Spectrascope;9800;n/a;invalid - bad link

46;doopypeanut;9495;n/a;invalid - bad link

47;visagepoissons;n/a;n/a;invalid - bad link

48;Deathmineral;9032;n/a;invalid - bad link

49;betauser;2035;n/a;invalid - bad link

[BluePanda]

Oh your screenshot doesn't match your link, just checked . Should be an easy fix. Link says your score is lower.

 

 

they seem to match to me -- perhaps I'm being tarded... 18090...

[Nightmaresiege]

Good scripting job haha. Are you guys doing a daily update kind of thing?

[Nightmaresiege]

they seem to match to me -- perhaps I'm being tarded... 18090...

 

For me your link says 17843 3DMarks... Could someone else confirm?

[Sihastru]

BluePanda - link now seems to match your score, it didn't a few hours ago...

Nightmaresiege - probably a typo, sorry, fixed... not sure what's the time in NY, but here is 4 AM...

 

list is now updated...

Edited August 29, 2010 by Sihastru

[Guest ajmatson]

I can understand you wanting to allow unapproved drivers (though the requirements do state that validation links are required), but there is no way older versions of 3DMark should be allowed, as scores can not truly be compared across versions.

 

I totally understand disqualifying older versions especially because of the issues with nvidia hardware being scored higher in the old versions. For the drivers though they are official ATI drivers not some hacked ones so they should be allowed IMHO. Hopefully Bosco or CCokeman can clarify these issues for us

[Sihastru]

And how can we know for sure they are not hacked?

 

Also a little joke:

 

I also removed [...] Bosco [...]

You don't remove Bosco... Bosco removes you!

 

 

LE: added Hemidare, not that he qualifies...

Edited August 29, 2010 by Sihastru

[Nightmaresiege]

BluePanda - link now seems to match your score, it didn't a few hours ago...

Nightmaresiege - probably a typo, sorry, fixed... not sure what's the time in NY, but here is 4 AM...

 

list is now updated...

 

Haha thanks a lot Sihastru! It's only 9:40 now.

[The Smith]

You don't remove Bosco... Bosco removes you!

 

Also do you want to run the ordering script yourself, since you're updating your lists?

 

Here is the updated one to get the positions:

#!/usr/bin/python

import csv

Input = open("Scores.txt", 'rb')
Reader = csv.reader(Input, delimiter=';')

Headers = Reader.next()

ScoresList = []
for NewScore in Reader:
   Inserted = False
   for i, Score in enumerate(ScoresList):
       if NewScore[1] == "n/a":
           break
       if Score[1] == "n/a":
           continue
       if int(Score[1]) <= int(NewScore[1]):
           ScoresList.insert(i, NewScore)
           Inserted = True
    break
   if Inserted == False:
       ScoresList.append(NewScore)

Input.close()
Output = open("OrderedScores.txt", 'wb')
Writer = csv.writer(Output, delimiter=';')
Writer.writerow(Headers)
for i, Score in enumerate(ScoresList):
   Writer.writerow([i+1]+Score)
Output.close()

[werty316]

I can understand you wanting to allow unapproved drivers (though the requirements do state that validation links are required), but there is no way older versions of 3DMark should be allowed, as scores can not truly be compared across versions.

Scores in v1.2.0 won't go "public" for me for some reason which is why I used an older version. I've tried everything and nothing will let me put any scores "public" in v1.2.0.