Angry_Games Posted June 4, 2004 Posted June 4, 2004 SLK-947U w/Enermax 92mm adjustable @ 2500RPM = 32°C (P4 3.4ES) the A64 might be rated cooler, but its definitely NOT cooler (as witnessed by me and the A64-3400+ that is running in my rig with an SLK-948U + Enermax 92mm @ 43°C A64 has more surface area than any of the cpu's but is still a bit of a hot runner. Not like the Prescrap tho. but like I keep telling everyone, when they ramp the Prescott up to 4Ghz and higher, it will be one ₪₪₪₪ of a cpu (and by then they will hopefully have killed the heat a bit...look at the original Tbird AMD and Palomino AMD cpus vs their latest offerings) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
red930 Posted June 4, 2004 Posted June 4, 2004 OK...I switched around a bit... New Toaster submission... 250 FSB 2505Mhz! http://www.thepeaks.com/bb/toaster250.jpg [bIMG]http://www.thepeaks.com/bb/toaster250.jpg[/bIMG] W00t! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FDM Posted June 4, 2004 Posted June 4, 2004 nice work Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dippyskoodlez Posted June 4, 2004 Posted June 4, 2004 Originally posted by Angry_Games ₪₪₪₪ of a cpu (and by then they will hopefully have killed the heat a bit...look at the original Tbird AMD and Palomino AMD cpus vs their latest offerings) But also look at their die size: 180nm- pally/tbird avg wattage at 1.3ghz: 75W 130nm: 3200+ is 89W and more than 2x the speed Preshott no longer has a die shrink available as an option. Unless they get some miracle, I see heat as a constant problem for that CPU. I still think they should get an oven =P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bypolar Posted June 4, 2004 Posted June 4, 2004 Ya that looks fine. Thanks. Originally posted by king of nothing bypolar --- Is this what you wanted? If not, just let me know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of nothing Posted June 5, 2004 Posted June 5, 2004 barebear --- How's this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pastryrocks Posted June 5, 2004 Posted June 5, 2004 Originally posted by king of nothing You could be the first. I don’t have a snowballs chance in ₪₪₪₪ of running Prime95 at 250FSB for 8 hours! Not even in my wildest dreams!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barebear Posted June 5, 2004 Posted June 5, 2004 Great, thanks k0n looks good to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of nothing Posted June 5, 2004 Posted June 5, 2004 FDM --- Here's your sig. I changed the vid card for you. Let me know if you want anything different. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FDM Posted June 5, 2004 Posted June 5, 2004 one tiny little error - cpu should be 2631 But it looks great! I will throw it in my sig as soon as I get back from AT (leaving tommorrow back in 2 weeks) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
king of nothing Posted June 5, 2004 Posted June 5, 2004 Originally posted by FDM one tiny little error - cpu should be 2631 Okay. Let me toss this out to everyone. I've debated what number to use as cpu speed. It was never an issue with the original toaster sig because every one just said +250FSB and +2500MHz. But now that I'm trying to make them more personalized, I'm using the specs you had when you took your screenie. But then I have to decide which specs to go by --- what CPU-Z says in your screenie or by what you obviously had set in your BIOS. Let's look at FDM here as an example. His screenie has CPU-Z reading: 250.6 FSB 10.5 Multiplier 2631 MHZ His sig and I'm assuming his BIOS says "XP-M 2600+ 250x10.5 1.925v" which comes out to 2625 MHz and the info he sent me to put in the text of his sig says "Mobile 2600+ 2630Mhz" So the question is, which do I use? So far I've been going by the BIOS and using my calculator. Mostly because some of the sigs have stuff like "10x250=2500 MHz" and it bugs me when I see things like "10x250=2505". I should probably see a therapist or something..... but I like for my math to add up. Anyway...... what's your opinion? I've changed a few sigs as I've made them and if I need to get over my 'incorrect math' phobia and change them back.... I'll be happy to do so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry_Games Posted June 5, 2004 Posted June 5, 2004 i go by what cpu-z or the actual bios mhz speed shows, not by flat calculation. ive done this ever since my Asus A7V which never ran at 100FSB, it always ran at a true 101.7FSB but showed 100FSB...this is how mobo makers edge out others in competition...let it pump just a lil bit more into it (like a stealth overclock!). I get weird readings off certain boards that do this too. Up to you since you are the sig maker, but when I tell ppl to contact you, i always tell them PM KING OF NOTHING AND TELL HIM WHAT YOU WANT IN YOUR SIG this means that the person wanting the sig is responsible for telling you what he wants his/her sig to show. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now