Muchoman1 Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 There is nothing wrong with your card Large and in red may help you understand. The benchmarks are synthetic tests which always have variation and thanks to the new dynamic clocks the variation tends to be a bit more. Yep, all 5 680s i have run have all had differing scores, even same model ones (evga superclock signature2) There is nothing wrong at all. Now SLI them and push some sweet benches Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
litwicki22 Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 Last question to you:).That fps variations on first card between the same GT on next loops are not too high? For example: Drop from 9458 to 9399 ( GT1 : 0,59 fps and GT2: 0,64 fps ) score and drop from 9438 to 9396 scores ( GT1: 0,56 FPS and GT2: 0,49 FPS ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 Wow. No. It's been said many times already there's nothing wrong with your card. Are you really that worried about LESS than 1% variation? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vandreadstriker Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 Let me try this in Blue: There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG with your card. ever heard the phrase "within a margin of error?". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El_Capitan Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 Something's wrong with your card. sell it to me for $250 before it loses its value! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nyt Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 (edited) Let me try this in Blue: There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG with your card. My turn for green since he does have a Nvidia card There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG with your card. But seriously, its fine. Soon you're gonna be asking why you dont get 100% FPS doubling in games and benchmarks because you have two 680s Edited September 11, 2012 by Midnight Rider Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
litwicki22 Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 OK thx guys for all, for replies. Now i am more patient. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wevsspot Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 OK thx guys for all, for replies. Now i am more patient. That's good because you were getting pretty close to exhausting our patience levels asking the same question over and over ........................... JK - we never run out of patience........................... or do we? However, welcome to OCC. Hope you hang around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
litwicki22 Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 yes i was just scared about results on my 1 card. I mean about that differences larger than second card. But you tell me , that is nothing wrong with that i am patient now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black64 Posted September 11, 2012 Posted September 11, 2012 yes i was just scared about results on my 1 card. I mean about that differences larger than second card. But you tell me , that is nothing wrong with that i am patient now. Same thing happened to me when I had SLI 8800GTS in my system, one had slightly higher scores, but they are so close you never notice it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cespenar Posted September 14, 2012 Posted September 14, 2012 (edited) Somebody has the blues .... ooo ... ooo ... And somebody is redfaced and angereeee .... he he he ... Just for the record my newbie, my single GTX 670 will run differently every time I run Futuremark. Edited September 14, 2012 by Cespenar Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
litwicki22 Posted September 15, 2012 Posted September 15, 2012 I mean scores on my first card,like : 9458 to 9399 then 9438 to 9396 , then 9436 to 9391 and 9391 to 9442 are OK or not good ? I mean that variant score points differences. While on second card i have smaller differences ,see : 9417 ->9427 --> 9414 --> 9438 -->9428 What do you think about first card? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now