gotdamojo06 Posted March 26, 2007 Posted March 26, 2007 halogammer did the setting of it up for me, however it didnt want to connect at first, the servers were down...then when it started to work, it was going to take too long on my AMP 1200+ processors, so console version is going to work better Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCC10281982B Posted April 3, 2007 Posted April 3, 2007 Quick update. I've had the windows client running fine for 2 plus weeks. Everything has been fine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClayMeow Posted June 7, 2007 Posted June 7, 2007 Running a X2 5200+...should I install the SMP Client or set up the regular F@H client for both cores? Which will have the best results? And is the SMP Client stable, despite being beta? (stability is important because this is my work computer, not home) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdingeling Posted June 7, 2007 Posted June 7, 2007 SMP definetly, but I dunno bout the Windows SMP client. What kind of work do you do, cause if you run the Linux SMP in VMware (best of the best), it won't slow down when you need extra processor resources. The Windows SMP should still be better than dual instances still. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ste Posted June 7, 2007 Posted June 7, 2007 Running a X2 5200+...should I install the SMP Client or set up the regular F@H client for both cores? Which will have the best results? And is the SMP Client stable, despite being beta? (stability is important because this is my work computer, not home) If your concerned about Points, as how most F@H stats are taken, then the SMP Client would be better.. Now if your more concerned about gettings alot of WU's done reguardless of the amount of points they are worth then you should have two instances of the regular console version. ( I think, Depends on the Proc I guess.) As for stability, its always stable at stock speeds. Only some people like me, have problems with High OCs. For example I am currently testing 3.294 Ghz for SMP Stability. Ill let it run for two days or so and if SMP has no problems then Ill try to move up. I had to start over when SMP would NOT run stable at 3.41 GHz. Edit: On the 2610 WU's I get about 12 Minutes and 30 seconds a Percent when I am not using computer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdingeling Posted June 7, 2007 Posted June 7, 2007 SMP client still finishes WUs faster than dual instances @ ste! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
road-runner Posted June 7, 2007 Posted June 7, 2007 (edited) Running a X2 5200+...should I install the SMP Client or set up the regular F@H client for both cores? Which will have the best results? And is the SMP Client stable, despite being beta? (stability is important because this is my work computer, not home) Definitely install SMP if you want more points per day. As far as work units I think the SMP gets a lot more done in one WU than the old clients. Theres a reason they came out with SMP and you can believe it was not to just give us more points. I promise you that! Linux SMP Project : 2604 Core : Gromacs SMP Frames : 100 Credit : 1760 -- E6400 -- Min. Time / Frame : 12mn 40s - 2000.84 ppd Avg. Time / Frame : 12mn 40s - 2000.84 ppd -- Pentium D 920 -- Min. Time / Frame : 21mn 02s - 1204.94 ppd Avg. Time / Frame : 21mn 09s - 1198.30 ppd -- E6300 -- Min. Time / Frame : 12mn 38s - 2006.12 ppd Avg. Time / Frame : 12mn 41s - 1998.21 ppd -- //David-desktop/folding/FAH/ -- Min. Time / Frame : 20mn 15s - 1251.56 ppd Avg. Time / Frame : 20mn 22s - 1244.39 ppd -- E6600 -- Min. Time / Frame : 11mn 27s - 2213.45 ppd Avg. Time / Frame : 11mn 39s - 2175.45 ppd -- Pentium D 915 -- Min. Time / Frame : 21mn 00s - 1206.86 ppd Avg. Time / Frame : 21mn 15s - 1192.66 ppd Edited June 7, 2007 by road-runner Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ste Posted June 7, 2007 Posted June 7, 2007 SMP client still finishes WUs faster than dual instances @ ste! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClayMeow Posted June 7, 2007 Posted June 7, 2007 Will VM_Ware allow me to run it as a service? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
road-runner Posted June 7, 2007 Posted June 7, 2007 Will VM_Ware allow me to run it as a service? Not that I know of. The service option does not work yet unless theres a way that I do not know about. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClayMeow Posted June 7, 2007 Posted June 7, 2007 Ah, okay. Then I guess I'll just do dual regular clients. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kendellrt Posted June 7, 2007 Posted June 7, 2007 The Windows SMP client does not yet support running as a service, so I haven't jumped in yet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now