Splave Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 haha its pretty late memoceio but It says an hour and 40 minutes You are forgiven Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thraxz Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 Okay, Big Johnson is officially at 3.6Ghz 4-4-4-12 DDR1000 stable and folding! Soon Little Willy will get 'the treatment' and move up in the world to Big Willy. Eventually Tiny Tim will get back up an folding for 45454 when I have the other two squared away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
momoceio Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 haha its pretty late memoceio but It says an hour and 40 minutes You are forgiven DOH! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 what the highest our team has ever ranked? anyone know? I want to see top 100 out of us. Also what is advmethods flag? and how do I enable it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tasr Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 what the highest our team has ever ranked? anyone know? I want to see top 100 out of us. Also what is advmethods flag? and how do I enable it? Splave, When I started folding (Oct 06) the team (45454) was ranked at 189. If we make it into the top 100 that would be glorious. Which SMP client are you running, Linux or WinSMP? If you’re running Linux SMP you can edit your config via telnet with this command > sudo ./fah5 -local –configonly As far a I gathered it doesn’t matter if you have Advanced Methods enabled or not. Both versions of SMP are still Beta and Stanford has yet to really enable that option on their end. You can research the following quotes and links. Set Advanced Methods to No, even if you plan to enable Advanced Methods (commonly referred to as -advmethods). We will enable the -advmethods flag in a future step along w/ some additional flags. Reference: http://fahwiki.net/index.php/Client.cfg Also refer to post #7 of this thread; http://forums.pcper.com/showthread.php?p=4054498 I will update my post on the client config and ask #337 to edit the SMP guide. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thraxz Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 After some testing I'm ALMOST ready to conclude that folding is heavily weighted towards ram SPEED not timings. Once I get this 3.5Ghz DDR1178 cas 5 occt run out of the way, folding I will go to prove it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 interesting, CAnt wait to see your results Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thraxz Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Well, DDR1174 cas5 and 3.52Ghz is about 30sec per frame faster than 3.6GHz DDR1000 cas4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEnumber337 Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Well, DDR1174 cas5 and 3.52Ghz is about 30sec per frame faster than 3.6GHz DDR1000 cas4 Thraxz, don't only look at speed but also look at bandwidth. I can't wait to see your results. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thraxz Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Speed IS bandwidth for the most part. Only slightly effected by small timings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEnumber337 Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Speed IS bandwidth for the most part. Only slightly effected by small timings. True. However, I think if you ran just one bandwidth benchmark along with your speed + timings configurations it would improve the results. This is just my opinion though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thraxz Posted April 26, 2007 Posted April 26, 2007 Ugh, why does everest read test suck so bad? It claimed only <6000mb/s and my DDR494 1.5-2-2-0 BH-5 posted in high 7's. SO.... 2.6Ghz and cas4 DDR1000 = 10min 30sec per % on 2610. 2.53GHz and DDR1178 cas 5 = 10min 1sec per % on 2610 On 2653 and 4200+ 2.63GHz/DDR: 4-4-4-12-2T= 20min 1-5sec 4-4-4-10-1T= 18 min 20sec So, depends on the WU for now. But I still see more importance placed on MHz. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now