kingdingeling Posted December 29, 2007 Posted December 29, 2007 I don't see no screenshot? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeble Posted December 29, 2007 Posted December 29, 2007 (edited) I don't see no screenshot? That's probably because there isn't one. Time to get my Blood Iron up and running. Edited December 29, 2007 by Bleeble Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
road-runner Posted December 29, 2007 Posted December 29, 2007 That's probably because there isn't one. There are none. I ran OCCT a few times and ended up settling for 3600 on 1.525 vcore bios setting and changed drives back to linux added a second client and its folding.... Edit: I put the quad where my E6850 was. My DQ6 came back yesterday so I am putting it and the E6850 back together and upstairs to Fold also.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdingeling Posted December 29, 2007 Posted December 29, 2007 Ahh, I see Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleeble Posted December 31, 2007 Posted December 31, 2007 OK, finally got my Q6700 and Blood Iron up and running... and I've got tomorrow and the next day off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hardnrg Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 OCCT 3681 MHz Q6600 G0 - water Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hardnrg Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 (edited) SuperPi 1M: 13.422s 3810 MHz Q6600 G0 - water OH YEAH! 3rd place in ya face! Edited January 5, 2008 by hardnrg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
road-runner Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 SuperPi 1M: 13.422s3810 MHz Q6600 G0 - water OH YEAH! 3rd place in ya face! I guess I will have to put the windows drive back in. Since the rules have changed to running a single instance only, I think the scores need to be wiped clean and start over instead of comparing apples to oranges. I surely am not installing windows on every rig I have and rerun the benches... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hardnrg Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 (edited) I think All-core runs should be kept, but just the MHz speed, not the time, as a stability level... like the 939 thread... it is harder to pass on all cores without a doubt, so I run all cores when testing stability... the current results would be ordered by MHz speed and then make a new single instance timed leaderboard I don't actually care about single instance runs... they don't really show stability of the full cpu... Rehit's 3800mhz 13.375s score is not a simultaneous run Edited January 5, 2008 by hardnrg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccokeman Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 Looks like if that is the case I'll have to slap the 12 second run in here and pull 2nd place for now.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rehit Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 i have yet to understand the concept of running 4 instances on a quad chip or two on a dual. when you run a single instance it seems like it is using all the cores on both type chips if you monitor the temps. running more than one instance is just doubling or quadrupling the load on the CPU which results in greatly increased temperatures. to me this seems to give the people with the least amount of cores a distinct advantage due to cooling. basically kicking the high performance chips to the end of the heap up front. is the running of more than one instance intended to work like a handicap in golf and level the playing field? it is also a major PIA to set up 4 seperate instances of the program and to set the affinity to each core every time you make a run. it does matter if you do it that way, the result when you do not set the affinity to each core is different than when you do set it. i would assume that is why the option to set the affinity is available. i am not trying to start an argument, i am just trying to understand the logic behind running multiple instances. the last scores i posted for super pi are indeed single instance runs, but i posted them after kingdingeling relaxed the rules. BTW... i am in 2nd place on 32M... perhaps my times will improve when my Raptor gets here next week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
firky Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 I think All-core runs should be kept, but just the MHz speed, not the time, as a stability level... like the 939 thread... it is harder to pass on all cores without a doubt, so I run all cores when testing stability... the current results would be ordered by MHz speed and then make a new single instance timed leaderboard Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now