Jump to content

Overclocking Cpu Having No Effect On Crysis


skating101

Recommended Posts

System:

 

CPU: E7200

RAM: 2GB DDR2 800

HDD: 160GB 7200rpm

Graphics: MSI R4850

Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45 DS3L

OS: Windows XP Service Pack 2

Drivers: Catalyst 8.9

 

Crysis 1.1 Benchmarks (Average frames per second):

 

Settings: 1770 x 1000, All High, 2 x AA

 

CPU underclocked @ 2.133GHz

 

Benchmark CPU: Test 1: 22FPS Test 2: 23FPS

Benchmark GPU: Test 1: 24FPS Test 2: 25FPS

 

CPU @ stock 2.533GHz

 

Benchmark CPU: Test 1: 22FPS Test 2: 23FPS

Benchmark GPU: Test 1: 24FPS Test 2: 26FPS

 

CPU @ overclocked 2.850GHz

 

Benchmark CPU: Test 1: 22FPS Test 2: 23FPS

Benchmark GPU: Test 1: 24FPS Test 2: 25FPS

 

 

 

Why does CPU overclocking have no effect on this game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

OCing ur CPU a bit more will probs give it a few FPS.

 

 

 

Think it must be WS.

 

Yes the monitor is WS 24"

 

I have overclocked the GPU and Mem and no effect on either benchmark.

 

GPU Overclocked from 625MHz to 680MHz

Memory Overclocked from 993MHz to 1050MHz

 

Any more tips? I expected this setup to get around 30 FPS average at this resolution and settings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats still an awkward res for a 24" monitor... but w/e

 

625 to 680 is only a 55MHz overclock, you probably won't see a whole lot of improvement on that end. i overclocked my 8800gt from 650(superclocked version) to ~730 and it really didn't play a whole lot better in crysis, maybe up 2-4 fps. on 3DMark06 however it boosted me up over 1000 pts...

 

 

Also, what are the FSB ratios in each of those 3 setups you listed in your first post, i know that when i benched my system, it ran better at stock with a 1:1 FSB ratio than overclocked with some funky ratio my board gave it, think 13:16.

Edited by turophiliac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

System:

 

CPU: E7200

RAM: 2GB DDR2 800

HDD: 160GB 7200rpm

Graphics: MSI R4850

Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45 DS3L

OS: Windows XP Service Pack 2

Drivers: Catalyst 8.9

 

Crysis 1.1 Benchmarks (Average frames per second):

 

Settings: 1770 x 1000, All High, 2 x AA

 

CPU underclocked @ 2.133GHz

 

Benchmark CPU: Test 1: 22FPS Test 2: 23FPS

Benchmark GPU: Test 1: 24FPS Test 2: 25FPS

 

CPU @ stock 2.533GHz

 

Benchmark CPU: Test 1: 22FPS Test 2: 23FPS

Benchmark GPU: Test 1: 24FPS Test 2: 26FPS

 

CPU @ overclocked 2.850GHz

 

Benchmark CPU: Test 1: 22FPS Test 2: 23FPS

Benchmark GPU: Test 1: 24FPS Test 2: 25FPS

 

 

 

Why does CPU overclocking have no effect on this game?

 

Yeah and you're barely overclocking your cpu, a few MHz won't do much

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thats still an awkward res for a 24" monitor... but w/e

 

625 to 680 is only a 55MHz overclock, you probably won't see a whole lot of improvement on that end. i overclocked my 8800gt from 650(superclocked version) to ~730 and it really didn't play a whole lot better in crysis, maybe up 2-4 fps. on 3DMark06 however it boosted me up over 1000 pts...

 

 

Also, what are the FSB ratios in each of those 3 setups you listed in your first post, i know that when i benched my system, it ran better at stock with a 1:1 FSB ratio than overclocked with some funky ratio my board gave it, think 13:16.

 

Ill try and overclock the GPU more (to around GPU:700Mhz Mem: 1100MHz) using Catalyst after work this evening and ill post the results.

 

The FSB ratio is at 2:3 i believe ill have to check that and get back to you. Thanks for the tips

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

700 MHz should be a noticeable difference if he was CPU bound.

 

thats what i was thinking lol so i guess that i am GPU bound however im not getting the same the same average framerate at a similar resolution as in this test:

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon...on,2007-13.html

 

The equivalent resolution is 1680 x 1050 and without AA they get 27FPS however without AA I only get 24FPS average any ideas? Does their faster CPU count for much?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...