dling Posted July 1, 2017 Posted July 1, 2017 Does it make any difference how I get to the speed I want? Either raising the cpu speed or the blck to get there. I seem to remember that it's better to get the overclock by raising the cpu speed over the blck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulktreg Posted July 2, 2017 Posted July 2, 2017 Triple post! Been hitting the beer? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dling Posted July 3, 2017 Posted July 3, 2017 (edited) No. It's the cell ph. I can't tell if the post goes thru or not. Drinking the beer now. Edited July 3, 2017 by dling Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dling Posted July 3, 2017 Posted July 3, 2017 Friggimg phone. I fat finger so much . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccokeman Posted July 3, 2017 Posted July 3, 2017 You can get there either way. Straight bclock multiplier is the easiest but depending on your chip it may like one or the other. I use both Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dling Posted July 3, 2017 Posted July 3, 2017 It seems that using the blck is not stable. I can to 4.5g either way but computer crashes when I overclock via the blck. I could try increasing core voltage but I'm already at 1.3vdc . I think I will just keep what I have bclk @100 x core @ 45 =4.5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xenkw0n Posted July 3, 2017 Posted July 3, 2017 It depends on the processor. I know for Intel chips that the X58 platform was the last one that truly allowed you to push the BCLK for higher overclocks. QPI speed, memory speed, cpu speed and cpu cache speed is also tied directly to the BCLK so your multipliers for all of them on an X58 system need to be accounted for as well. If you're talking about your X99 system, just change your multipliers. Messing with the BCLK on sandy-bridge and newer systems can cause stability issues. Though I will say on X58 that increasing your BCLK makes the system slightly faster... Puts a lot more stress on the motherboard, though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dling Posted July 3, 2017 Posted July 3, 2017 It depends on the processor. I know for Intel chips that the X58 platform was the last one that truly allowed you to push the BCLK for higher overclocks. QPI speed, memory speed, cpu speed and cpu cache speed is also tied directly to the BCLK so your multipliers for all of them on an X58 system need to be accounted for as well. If you're talking about your X99 system, just change your multipliers. Messing with the BCLK on sandy-bridge and newer systems can cause stability issues. Though I will say on X58 that increasing your BCLK makes the system slightly faster... Puts a lot more stress on the motherboard, though. that seem to be my outcome also with the x99 MB. I'm able to get better stability from the multiplier then the bclk . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ir_cow Posted July 3, 2017 Posted July 3, 2017 I've never been able to get a good OC with blck myself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xenkw0n Posted July 4, 2017 Posted July 4, 2017 2nd-5th gen processors can't push bclk very far. Seems to be the consensus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeSoprano Posted July 4, 2017 Posted July 4, 2017 +1 on above posts, with my sandy bridge even a 5 mhz oc on the base clock would cause blue screens, the multyplier is the way to go for sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynamic Posted July 5, 2017 Posted July 5, 2017 Doesn't overclocking the BLCK effect other hardware that aren't meant to be overclocked? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now