Bosco Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/palit_gt220_sonic/ Sorry for the lack of lowered cards in the review we don't have much left Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeeWee90 Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 From what i understand, the 4670 from AMD beats the crap out of this card, and costs less aswell... A swing and a miss for the green team... B:) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkrow21 Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 From what i understand, the 4670 from AMD beats the crap out of this card, and costs less aswell... A swing and a miss for the green team... B:) At gaming, yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Crabs Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 Great review, but I would have liked to have seen the Palit GT 220 tested against the 4670. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 Great review, but I would have liked to have seen the Palit GT 220 tested against the 4670. If we would have had one left we would have Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVIYTH0S Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 (edited) At gaming, yes. and pricing, and features yes heck you could even get an 8800GT cheaper than this waste of a PCI-E slot Thanks for the review though coke, I bet you can't wait to get back to a quality card again Edited October 12, 2009 by IVIYTH0S Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tkrow21 Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 and pricing, and features yes Wouldn't it be a better workstation graphics card? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVIYTH0S Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 Wouldn't it be a better workstation graphics card? wouldn't an 8800GT? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baulten Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 I was disappointed in the lack of lower end cards compared. The review was good, but the comparisons simply were not the right ones for the demographic the card is aimed at. Someone looking at this card would not also be looking at GTX 260+ level cards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVIYTH0S Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 (edited) I was disappointed in the lack of lower end cards compared. The review was good, but the comparisons simply were not the right ones for the demographic the card is aimed at. Someone looking at this card would not also be looking at GTX 260+ level cards. you aren't missing much (compared to 210 and 4650) you REALLY aren't missing much (compared to 210 and 4670) Edited October 12, 2009 by IVIYTH0S Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xly15 Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 Wow, sounds like Nvidia kinda messed it up here. They should have just waited till they release the GT300. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.E.A Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 4770 is way better than it , even 4750 , but good review , crap piece of hardware another black spot for nvidia , and a winning spot for AMD , ATI wins in mainstream stuff , integrated gpus , video cards , .. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts