romeo55 Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 (edited) It's that time of year guys - decide who you believe deserves some props and recognition for there services to the OCC community. Whether it be good, bad, or funny, take part and have some fun! There will be prizes, courtesy of claymeow; here are last years prizes. Bosco has also offered up an Intel Core 2 Quad 6600 if we get 30 member nominations! The schedule: Nominations Closed (1/14/08 Monday - 02/2/08 Saturday at 12:00AM EST) Voting Closed (2/2/08 - 2/17/8 12:00AM EST) Results and Prizes (2/22/08) Edited February 23, 2008 by The Unforgivin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze_Badger Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 I see no nomination thread . Do we still need the '06 list up? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
razor Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 can I nominate PhilBrown for the "...not as I do" award? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
romeo55 Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 I see no nomination thread . Do we still need the '06 list up? Done, linked in above post. I'll leave the 06 results up, they're interesting enough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 This will be fun. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
romeo55 Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 (edited) One person per category guys, cough cough king Edited January 14, 2008 by The Unforgivin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClayMeow Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 There will be prizes, courtesy of claymeow; here are last years prizes.Says who?! lol, j/k. EDIT: I'm not sure having it where you can only nominate a person once is wise. By doing that I think we'll run into a problem of not having enough nominees for some categories. I don't think we had this limit last year, and we still had a couple of categories with only one nominee. I understand the reason behind doing it that way, but I don't think it's a viable solution for us. You can use your judgment if someone is abusing it (eg. If I choose king for every category and king chooses me for every category...then I think it'd be pretty obvious we're being ****'s...I mean, not playing fair ). I don't want you changing the rule just because of me though, so what do other people think? Can people even name 32 members off the top of their head? lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdingeling Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 One person per category guys, cough cough king I SAID subject to change ya big noob Undecided is what that means Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
romeo55 Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 (edited) New Category added, Grouchiest Member courtesy of bosco @king: Ah, Edited January 14, 2008 by The Unforgivin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze_Badger Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 Done, linked in above post. I'll leave the 06 results up, they're interesting enough. They're a year old... they can be linked to in the new thread, but otherwise it clutters the stickies. And I agree with Clay, more than one nomination per person works best to help fill all the categories. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 And I agree with Clay, more than one nomination per person works best to help fill all the categories. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
road-runner Posted January 14, 2008 Posted January 14, 2008 I'm not sure having it where you can only nominate a person once is wise. By doing that I think we'll run into a problem of not having enough nominees for some categories. I don't think we had this limit last year, and we still had a couple of categories with only one nominee. I understand the reason behind doing it that way, but I don't think it's a viable solution for us. You can use your judgment if someone is abusing it (eg. If I choose king for every category and king chooses me for every category...then I think it'd be pretty obvious we're being ****'s...I mean, not playing fair ). I don't want you changing the rule just because of me though, so what do other people think? Can people even name 32 members off the top of their head? lol And I agree with Clay, more than one nomination per person works best to help fill all the categories. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now