rodan Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 Flapjackman:: on secon thought, I wouldn't install any other bios untill you get a ram upgrade from pc2100. 815 has a bug where it will auto set 216 fsb until its changed. If pc2100 can't cope, your snookered! Comprende? 705/711 bios is like hell on earth to go through. You don't want that..... Defenition: Snookered - trapped, a place in hell, no way out, bite the sianide pill, jump the twin towers, electrocution, de-balled, cry's mamma... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flapjackman176 Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 ok.. so ill get working on getting this ram as fast as possible Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodan Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 ok.. so ill get working on getting this ram as fast as possible I'm no expert on ram but doesn't VX (bh5?) require 3.5+ volts? So, I heard it can be done on this board with a 3.5v booster in a yellow slot with ram in the orange slot. Is the tccd better and cheaper? Need Mr. OG's help here ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonX Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 my ram maxes out at 235 with 3.2 volts to get higher mhz i put the 10 multi 166ram divider and ltd at 3 since i went past 250tt does everything sound right?Should i put back the 11 multi or keep the 10 since i put a divider on the ram? and how about the 9 multi any point for me to use it im at 2.7ghz right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodan Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 my ram maxes out at 235 with 3.2 volts to get higher mhz i put the 10 multi 166ram divider and ltd at 3 since i went past 250tt does everything sound right?Should i put back the 11 multi or keep the 10 since i put a divider on the ram? and how about the 9 multi any point for me to use it im at 2.7ghz right now. JasonX, is that ocz tccd(5) ram you have there? I don't know much about ocz ram. I spent $160 at newegg on 2x512 Patriot XBLK's and run 1:1 270 x 10 x 2T stable. Dunno, seems cheap I guess. In hindsight, I would have popped a hundred fifty and got the GSkill tccd supremes. The tccd ram before Patriot wouldn't do 240 fsb at 3448 without problems. I dunno. Can't think 1T on this board. 2T is key to high htt and will fix multi problems. I can boot 330 htt with Patriot getting 7800 read everest, but I can't (in past before heat sink mod but never tried higher) cold boot at that. Its my mobo I think and not anybody elses. If you are running a less than 1:1 divider I don't think will ever help you. Just my 2 cents. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blinker0 Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 He said it was the value VX = VX Without Heat spreaders. They are cheeper. TCCD would be a better choice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonX Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 JasonX, is that ocz tccd(5) ram you have there? I don't know much about ocz ram.I spent $160 at newegg on 2x512 Patriot XBLK's and run 1:1 270 x 10 x 2T stable. Dunno, seems cheap I guess. In hindsight, I would have popped a hundred fifty and got the GSkill tccd supremes. The tccd ram before Patriot wouldn't do 240 fsb at 3448 without problems. I dunno. Can't think 1T on this board. 2T is key to high htt and will fix multi problems. I can boot 330 htt with Patriot getting 7800 read everest, but I can't (in past before heat sink mod but never tried higher) cold boot at that. Its my mobo I think and not anybody elses. If you are running a less than 1:1 divider I don't think will ever help you. Just my 2 cents. Whats wrong with running ram with a divider i have it right now at 270x10 166divider 22251t no probs how about other multi like 9and 11 are they good with a ram divider?And should i put driver strength to weak? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodan Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 Nothing, 270 x .82 = 221. Thats ok. What are your benchmarks? Its a personal enginnering thing dividers are with me. With 1:1 it is sync with 166 its async, just my personal dislike. If you want to think 221 is sync then ok but I assure you it defenitiely is NOT.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xen Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 If you are running aless than 1:1 divider I don't think will ever help you. Just my 2 cents. you can be fine with a divider due to these amd64's being less dependant on memory bandwidth and more on raw cpu power. Search angry_games many postings on this concept. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonX Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 you can be fine with a divider due to these amd64's being less dependant on memory bandwidth and more on raw cpu power. Search angry_games many postings on this concept. if i stay with the 166 divider what multi should i use with my sandy and is there a big performance loss by a running a divider? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blinker0 Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 JasonX there is probly nothing wrong with youre memory.. Loosen them up a little use youre 11 X multi. and run 1:1 ... If you WILL LOOSEN timings Up I can almost Garrentee you will get better results (More Memory banwidth) and CPU MHZ.. "I repete Staying @ 2-2-2-5 right now is what is holding you back" If you want to run a 10 Multiplier you will most likely be able to run up memory MHZ a little more before you Max out youre CPU Back to my corner :confused: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodan Posted August 28, 2005 Posted August 28, 2005 you can be fine with a divider due to these amd64's being less dependant on memory bandwidth and more on raw cpu power. Search angry_games many postings on this concept. Me personally, I think a divider is meant for less capable ram. I don't think 2.7g cpu at 200fsb will give better performance than say 2.4 at 250 1:1. But I can guarantee the same ram performance or better. So the SD can oc very good but the cpu will starve for data without better ram. Dividers mean waiting for ram does not mean waiting for cpu. No matter how fast the cpu is, bad ram will make it wait and wait. And that is usually the realm of dividers, just my 2 cents. Do you need a divider if the cpu is 3.2g, well then yes you might. Obviously 1T is not capable of 1:1 past 220-230 on this board. Why even worry when 2T can take you to ddr666 on average to good ram. We'ere talkin close to 8000 MB/s on 2t ddr666. What in the world does 1T have to do with anything? Even though you didn't mention it ever... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now