Andrewr05 Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 NEW THREAD HERE Official Y-Cruncher Score Thread y-cruncher By poke349 from Xtremesystems.org Warning... This program can be more intensive than prime95.Version 0.4.3 stress test runs hotter than both prime95 and Linpack on Core i7 with HT enabled. We've had our first dead motherboard as a result of this program. So watch your hardware if your overclock is borderline unsafe under prime95 and Linpack. Rules: Run y-cruncher at all the stock settings for 25 million digits of PI Post a screenshot of y-cruncher Post a screenshot of CPU-Z, both the CPU and MEMORY tab are preferred however just the CPU tab will suffice Score key: Hexa Core - Green Quad Core - Red Triple core - Magenta Dual Core - Orange Single Core - Yellow Atom/Other - Teal 0.5.3 Build 9134 (fix 2) Scores: AMD - INTEL - Cowking C2D E8400 @ 3.8Ghz 22.530 32bit injijagwalaafq T2370 @ 1.73GHz 64.611 32bit v0.4.4 Build 7760 Scores: AMD - lobob420 Phenom II X4 965 @ 4.1Ghz 10.431 64bit Gopher Love - Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.9Ghz 11.485 64bit damian - Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.65Ghz 11.982 64bit boinker Phenom II X4 940 @ 3.7Ghz 12.371 64bit f!ver Phenom II X4 940 @ 3.5Ghz 12.455 64bit XxHellxRaizerxX Phenom II X4 940 @ 3.5Ghz 12.662 64bit yuridude Phenom II x3 720 BE @ 3.62Ghz 17.583 64bit sdy284 939 Opteron 165 @ 2.2Ghz 69.469 32bit INTEL - kitfi1 Core i7 Extreme 975 @ 4.93Ghz 6.571 64bit Danny_75 Core i7 860 @ 4.2Ghz 7.262 64bit RJR Core i7 860 @ 4.2Ghz 7.302 64bit Water_Hazard Xeon W3520 @ 4.399Ghz 7.208 64bit Blaise Core i7 920 @ 4.2Ghz 7.445 64bit 7.679 xchrissypoox Core i7 920 @ 4.4Ghz 7.445 64bit sdy284 Core i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz 7.641 64bit guyrichi247 Core i7 920 @ 3.9Ghz 7.726 64bit OwinC Core i7 920 @ 4.09Ghz 8.145 64bit osmt2 i5 750 @ 4ghz 8.425 64bit Bosco Core i7 920 @ 3.6Ghz 8.661 64bit poke349 DUAL Xeon X5482's @ 3.2Ghz 9.861 64bit flareback - Core i7 920 @ 2.67Ghz 10.867 64bit Flibo Q9300 @ 3.6Ghz 12.350 64bit nVidia_Freak Q6600 @ 3.3Ghz 12.471 64bit Waco Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz 13.748 64bit Pezcore Q9550 @ 3.5Ghz 14.065 64bit IIxNullxII Q9550 @ 2.83Ghz 14.407 64bit Andrewr05 Xeon X3220 @ 3Ghz 14.743 64bit Flibo Q9300 @ 3.6Ghz 16.539 32bit Kash - Q6600 @ 2.4Ghz 17.866 64bit Cowking C2D E8400 @ 3.510Ghz 22.530 32bit Andrewr05 "Beast Case" Pentium 4 @ 1.79Ghz 356.752 32bit XxHellxRaizerxX Pentium III EB @ 1.19Ghz 611.367 32bit Danny_75 Pentium III EB @ 864.5Mhz 754.371 32bit WHO CAN POST THE WORST SCORE? PM me if I haven't updated this in a while. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damian Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 (edited) AMD Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.4GHz (stock) 25m - 13.832 Edited December 13, 2009 by damian Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kash Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Your post didn't mention it but I'm assuming you just want the 25M test Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Your post didn't mention it but I'm assuming you just want the 25M testI was debating with myself whether or not I wanted to do 25 and 50 but I think for simplicity we'll keep it just 25M. Whats with CPUZ on your rig? Was that a downclocked run? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 (edited) 25 million digits attached. EDIT: 64 bit. Whats with CPUZ on your rig? Was that a downclocked run? I assume he's got Speedstep enabled. Mine is too, it just didn't clock down when I took the shot. Mine sits at 2.4 GHz normally (400x6). Edited December 13, 2009 by Waco Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flareback Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Here is mine. 25M in 11.660 seconds core i7 920 6 Gigs DDR3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Xeon X3220 @ 3GHZ 32 bit Should we denote 32/64 bit on the scores as well? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nVidia_Freak Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 (edited) Copy pasta. Edit- You should make separate sections for 25m, 50m etc. Like what the original XS thread has. Edited December 13, 2009 by nVidia_Freak Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Should we denote 32/64 bit on the scores as well? That's probably a good idea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 You should make separate sections for 25m, 50m etc. Like what the original XS thread has.I might but we'll stick with 25M for now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Andrew - I wouldn't use the scores that include dumping the data to disk. Who cares about sustained write speeds on HDDs? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nVidia_Freak Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 (edited) Squeezing out just a little more. Edited December 13, 2009 by nVidia_Freak Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts