Waco Posted February 22, 2012 Posted February 22, 2012 Turn off the hax before you run the bench please. What? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T9Conflict Posted February 23, 2012 Posted February 23, 2012 2x6850 - 4968 http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=41157 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachAub Posted February 24, 2012 Posted February 24, 2012 My latest Furmark (1.9.2) score: 2779pts, 46 fps. http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=41492 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted February 24, 2012 Posted February 24, 2012 UPDATED Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted February 24, 2012 Posted February 24, 2012 you missed my last one........3807 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted February 24, 2012 Posted February 24, 2012 Oops, fixed... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted February 24, 2012 Posted February 24, 2012 Oops, fixed... I need to update my sig - I'm running a 5970 now - not the 4870X2s. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted February 24, 2012 Posted February 24, 2012 Derp, I looked at your sig and remembered that the 4870s weren't correct but kind of spaced it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted February 27, 2012 Posted February 27, 2012 Well this is with my old Phenom II driving the GPUs...but it's still better. http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=42417 SCORE: 6930 points (115 FPS) That's a little better. This 5970 is fun! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted February 27, 2012 Posted February 27, 2012 UPDATED Also version 1.9.2 has been being used, I'll have to denote that in the score list as I'm not sure 1.92 is comparable to 1.91. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted February 27, 2012 Posted February 27, 2012 I ran both and got the same scores. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted February 27, 2012 Posted February 27, 2012 That's good, hopefully there's no variation between the two. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now