babyelf Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 thnx terror.. will look for one Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tim Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 lol I keep getting random reboots at these settings.....1.6v should be enough Memory is stable....OCCT works great, but all of the sudden reboot, not at a specific point, sometimes at boot up, somtimes after 6 minutes of OCCT.... lol I'll wait for the new bios :nod: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joop Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 lol I keep getting random reboots at these settings.....1.6v should be enough Memory is stable....OCCT works great, but all of the sudden reboot, not at a specific point, sometimes at boot up, somtimes after 6 minutes of OCCT.... lol I'll wait for the new bios :nod: Is this set in the BIOS and then booting? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
arcane613 Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 so far... here is my max stable.. not really pushing tho.. at 40°c load like this.. and i'm only on the stock hsu.. till i get somethin new http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=23901 280x10 - 166 divider - 1.425v - 232fsb - 2-2-2-8-2t - 3.2vdimm - 1.75vdd Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joop Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 Maybe use some tools for OC. Smartguardian for system info's, ClockGen for little HTT steps and A64 Tweaker 0.60Beta for showing and setting all the DFI DRAM timings and configuration parameters (Warning: A64 Tweaker can't save and load the setting on HDD for later use correct!! it's a Beta ... with littly bug) and all together with 'Prime95 Turture Blend test' OR 'OCCT stabilty test' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNs Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 Wow i've only been offline for a couple of days and I have to read like 8 more pages. Interesting to see quite a vast range of results, mostly negative at this stage, but it's nice to see that some aren't having any probs. Considering that I'm not going to be using onboard SATA RAID i'm clear for that issue, but running at 2T is really something that i'm concerned about. Unless I actually loosen timings to run 310 1:1 it seems it'll be a prob. I guess there is an upside to getting this board a little later than others. ---dens Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
psy^ Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 Using nForce 7.11 at the moment without any issues. Er, those are meant to be nForce4 drivers. I'm surprised windows even loads :shake: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramon77 Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 Not sure where you guys are getting this "year old" stuff from. The 939 chips were released to the market a year ago. These 939 AGP boards are fairly new to the market. DFI showed DFI Lanparty NF3 ultra-D one year ago @ Computex 2004. For example, HERE you can find a report about it. As everyone can see, old layout and features were better than current ones: FOUR (and not only two) SAta ports by NF3 not so stupidly close to 939 socket; DDR slots layout better than the current one; FOUR (and not only two) SAta ports with onboard PCI cntrl (SI3114 vs Marvell 88SR3020); 8 channels audio with Karajan module (the same used on DFI NF4 mobos), against current 6 channels and so on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tetsujin Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 DFI showed DFI Lanparty NF3 ultra-D one year ago @ Computex 2004.For example, HERE you can find a report about it. As everyone can see, old layout and features were better than current ones: FOUR (and not only two) SAta ports by NF3 not so stupidly close to 939 socket; DDR slots layout better than the current one; FOUR (and not only two) SAta ports with onboard PCI cntrl (SI3114 vs Marvell 88SR3020); 8 channels audio with Karajan module (the same used on DFI NF4 mobos), against current 6 channels and so on. I completely agree with you. This is an evidence, not an opinion. I could tell that the nf3 ultra mobos arrived in september 2004, so DFI come here only 9 months later..not twelve :nod: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tim Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 Maybe they had some issues with it I really don't know....it's unclear to me why they didn't release it in that form.... Point is, they decided to not go with that layout, and we have this board. So, I don't care about looks or how a board should look like...this is what we have, the only thing I can see on this board is the SATA ports...they could have been a bit better... but looks in every way a different board..even up to the fan headers... :nod: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNs Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 As everyone can see, old layout and features were better than current ones: FOUR (and not only two) SAta ports by NF3 not so stupidly close to 939 socket; DDR slots layout better than the current one; FOUR (and not only two) SAta ports with onboard PCI cntrl (SI3114 vs Marvell 88SR3020); 8 channels audio with Karajan module (the same used on DFI NF4 mobos), against current 6 channels and so on. This was what I was counting on this board to be - everything that the Neo2 wasn't. I really hope that a few BIOS updates can turn this board around. Thing is, I really wonder why they ended up going with this board layout - I mean, if that setup worked, why change it so drastically? Not that i'm saying that it did work (being just a show version and all) but if it was a possible solution... ---dens Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forgiven Posted June 19, 2005 Posted June 19, 2005 Can't do much about the layout since it is out.... hopefully now they will iron the bios issue out asap... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now