BluePanda Posted February 13, 2012 Posted February 13, 2012 Oooo... New review. Thanks for the review PinkPanda. So far this case is screaming a mix between HAF and Thermaltake's Chaser. Hey everyone!! Thanks for all the nice comments. After a long day it's sure nice to come home and see someone appreciate something you've done! It means a lot. It is very interesting in appearance -- kinda in your face. The price is definitely a con on this one. I also agree that it's a HAF 932 run off, I think I've mentioned that in previous review, a lot of companies are really trying to play of the much loved HAF look. I mean even CM themselves are coming out with cell phone cases mocked up after the HAF series. As far as a WC section -- I understand why many of you would want to see this. For some reviewers this poses a problem for a few reasons. 1) not all reviewers have some WC equipment laying around for fit tests, 2) measuring for fit never really works, (there's always a problem to be found when you go to put it in) and 3) companies generally don't even hand out this factor. (especially if it's an NDA release) unless it's a "feature" of the case. Perhaps we could try this in a few of our reviews though. I've got an extra rad or two around here to test out fitting. It's a little time consuming but getting the readers what the want is important. We'll see what big DAVE has to say... Thanks again guys!! BTW PremiumAcc -- that's BLUEPanda to you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonerboy779 Posted February 13, 2012 Posted February 13, 2012 Hey everyone!! Thanks for all the nice comments. After a long day it's sure nice to come home and see someone appreciate something you've done! It means a lot. It is very interesting in appearance -- kinda in your face. The price is definitely a con on this one. I also agree that it's a HAF 932 run off, I think I've mentioned that in previous review, a lot of companies are really trying to play of the much loved HAF look. I mean even CM themselves are coming out with cell phone cases mocked up after the HAF series. As far as a WC section -- I understand why many of you would want to see this. For some reviewers this poses a problem for a few reasons. 1) not all reviewers have some WC equipment laying around for fit tests, 2) measuring for fit never really works, (there's always a problem to be found when you go to put it in) and 3) companies generally don't even hand out this factor. (especially if it's an NDA release) unless it's a "feature" of the case. Perhaps we could try this in a few of our reviews though. I've got an extra rad or two around here to test out fitting. It's a little time consuming but getting the readers what the want is important. We'll see what big DAVE has to say... Thanks again guys!! BTW PremiumAcc -- that's BLUEPanda to you. Greatest forum ever the ability to give site help and feedback directly to staff/admin and reviews and then have suggestions taken into consideration and often time implemented. If this goes ahead I shall say thanks to the reviews for putting in even more work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wevsspot Posted February 15, 2012 Posted February 15, 2012 I second that Stonerboy. Thanks Panda. We appreciate you - even if we question your taste in men Just kidding Waco! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
danieljury3 Posted February 19, 2012 Posted February 19, 2012 So did they take tool-less hard drive bays and decide the best way to improve them was to make them require tools? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluePanda Posted February 19, 2012 Posted February 19, 2012 So did they take tool-less hard drive bays and decide the best way to improve them was to make them require tools? That's the way it seems... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PingoPongo Posted February 19, 2012 Posted February 19, 2012 So did they take tool-less hard drive bays and decide the best way to improve them was to make them require tools? Is there a word for it? Like deinnovation or something? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddie Posted September 25, 2012 Posted September 25, 2012 . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts