Angry_Games Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 This is a discussion going on at my 2k hockey forum, but I thought I'd get a discussion going here Ever popped in a new CD of your favorite artist one day, only to have to turn it off a few songs into it? Have you ever wondered, "Why can't I keep listening to this?" Then you are just one of the many casualties in the "Loudness War." What is it, and what can we do to stop this? I suggest you read up on these articles and take a look at a YouTube video. http://moozeek.de/mirrors/articles/over_the_limit.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/aug07/5429 http://www.austin360.com/music/content/mus...09/28cover.html http://www.stylusmagazine.com/articles/wee...und-forever.htm Just to summarize for those who don't know, big record companies believe that if their songs are the loudest, they will grab the most attention on radio stations, which will in turn generate more sales. When one company does that, it convinces others to compete, and they start cranking up the volume as well. As a result, it destroys dynamic range and robs listeners of the color and life that older vinyl records had. It also creates listening fatigue. Imagine trying to read an entire paragraph in all capital letters. After the first sentence, you can't read anymore. Now imagine that happening every time you tried to listen to your favorite albums. The only way companies will stop doing this and start recognizing that this really doesn't help record sales is for consumers to complain. However, the average consumer won't recognize this, and the lifestyle we live in with competing noises such as loud traffic doesn't help us perceive this terrible injustice. Slowly, but surely, all of your favorite artists will be ruined by this stupid craze, if they haven't been already. Sad, isn't it? Yahoo Tech Blog: http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/33549 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPDMF Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 That explains about 50% of it, the other half to me seems to be the actual quality of music required to cut an album these days. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CopyNinjaKakash Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 Yeah ive heard about this before.. I rarely buy cds anymore anyway ::shrugs:: but its a shame if this is really happening. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
red930 Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 I only download <---read buy, songs i like and not even an album anymore...... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voltes-5 Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 Number of CD's I've bought for the last 12 months or so, 4. Couple of Micheal Buble albums which my wife loves and I also like and a best hits by Allman Brothers Band and best hits of "the Who". What I noticed with sound quality of the CD's that I last bought a while back is that it was too sharp for my ears. I thought my hearing was going bad. It seemed like the sound is too edgy and well... sharp. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blooz1 Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 I found many of the arguments in this column especially apt; http://www.stylusmagazine.com/articles/wee...und-forever.htm People are forgetting (or never really learned HOW) to listen! Many,many times I've noticed people in public places with iPod earbuds in place, totally oblivious to the world around them (a dangerous situation in and of itself!), yet they look like they're in pain rather than enjoying their sonic experience! Cliff brings up a good point about the quality of much of today's music. If people actually listened to some forms of music (such as lots of hip-hop), they'd find it sorely lacking in true content! To me, "sampling" other people's efforts and tacking new stuff on top of it doesn't make you an "artist"! Oh, this is an interesting subject! We've got a lot of people who ought to chime in to this one! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
red930 Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 Number of CD's I've bought for the last 12 months or so, 4. Couple of Micheal Buble albums which my wife loves and I also like and a best hits by Allman Brothers Band and best hits of "the Who". What I noticed with sound quality of the CD's that I last bought a while back is that it was too sharp for my ears. I thought my hearing was going bad. It seemed like the sound is too edgy and well... sharp. Well, on classic albums and anything close to Buble's sound I'd think they'd have a pretty decent audio engineer and good studio to work with the recordings. Anything considered "popular music" certainly has horrible recordings, many I've heard seem to reduce the dynamic range for no particular reason. I mean, I understand why they do it for the radio, but why bother on a CD? Rock is so iffy. Alternative is about as crappy as pop, death metal (and the like) tends to be sub-par as well. There are exceptions though, System of a Down won an award for a CD a few years ago, Maynard James Keenan's projects also usually have pretty good recordings. My one real big pet peeve in CD's though are the tracks that (for whatever reason) have a hiss in the background, or a staticky sound. You can tell it was purposely put there because the rest of the CD sounds clean. I hate it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
momoceio Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 Yep, I have a few CDs that when I listen to them I think something is wrong with my speakers but it's just the shat recording quality. I've thought about trying a hd cd to see if they sound any better... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voltes-5 Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 I used to have monthly subscription on Stereophile magazine. http://www.stereophile.com/columns/They have a review for cd's and other music. All of the recommended cd's that I have bought when reviewe and recommended are excellent sound quality wise. I get really tired of listening to the crap that they play on the radio now a days. When I get tired of listening to the 80's and early 90's rock collection I have, I try to relax my senses a bit with the movie soundtrack of "The Commitments", an excellent album. Sometimes I'd pop in Ravel's "Bolero". Too bad my turntable is buste, I cant listen to my vynil collection. I miss that warm analog sound. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
red930 Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 I actually miss some good blues....like B.B. King but as mentioned on on vinyl....so much better Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Blooz1 Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 You got dat right, KrankyOldLady! I've got a ton of blues albums (duh - it's my main thing!), many not replacable on CD, and they just don't sound the same when converted to digital format. John Mayall + Eric Clapton - the "Beano" album, Eric doin' "Hideaway" on an old Les Paul! There's tones in there that make yer hair stand on end! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry_Games Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 i never thought I'd say this, but I truly miss the vinyl...(for the same reason I keep going back to tube amplifiers over solid-state...there's no comparison between analog and digital for warmth and depth) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.