CanadaGUY Posted May 8, 2008 Posted May 8, 2008 Yep, if the ram is set at a 1:1 divider any PC6400 should do a 400mhz fine. That is if your MB/CPU can handle that kind of FSB Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philbrown23 Posted May 8, 2008 Posted May 8, 2008 the problem here is not the ram, it is the chip, every thing about these chips that I have read states that there is little to no oc potential. If you were looking for an ocing chip why did you buy a phenom? not trying to be harsh here, but seriously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_bowtie Posted May 9, 2008 Posted May 9, 2008 man where to start.... As in a post stated...drop the ram on a divider...? some of you know that with 65mn CPUs dividers do NOTHING...anyone use a Brisbane CPU? 65nm CPU are very ram dependent and Quads even more so...I would recommend either playing with the ram timings or trying the faster ram... For those of you who just say the CPU is bunk...? not so... the blame is more so justified in very a immature bios... the bugs just have not been worked out yet and same goes for the chipsets... for those of you playing with Phenoms you are the test guinea pigs... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beowulfhuntr Posted May 13, 2008 Posted May 13, 2008 (edited) well i was able to get it to load into windows eventually at 3.0, i had to up the voltage on my FSB and HT in order to do this. It's most def not stable at 3.0 but its very stable at 2.8 and i haven't had any problems with it since. Edited May 13, 2008 by beowulfhuntr Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now