Arkadiy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Just wondering if this was true? Got some extra money and I think I rather get this then the 3500+ Venice, right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoArmistead Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 not unlocked. Well...yes it is in a sense that you can Lower the multi, but you can't raise it. I'd go 3700 SD over 3500 V regardless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Raven65 Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 not unlocked. Well...yes it is in a sense that you can Lower the multi, but you can't raise it. I'd go 3700 SD over 3500 V regardless. 544639[/snapback] I have to agree. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoArmistead Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 I have to agree. 544641[/snapback] Coming from two guys that have 3700 Sandy's in their sigs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkadiy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 (edited) Coming from two guys that have 3700 Sandy's in their sigs 544642[/snapback] Lol, hmm, I heard San Diego did, maybe it wasnt the 3700+? Are there any other ones? Edited September 14, 2005 by Arkadiy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoArmistead Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Lol, hmm, I heard San Diego did, maybe it wasnt the 3700+? Are there any other ones? 544645[/snapback] the FX55 and FX57 have san diego cores and unlocked multies, but the 4000 and below with SD cores are locked at 11-. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
slugbug3311 Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 3700 sandys are awesome. I have a week 22 and it overclocks like poop though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkadiy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Ok, thanks guys Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoArmistead Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 3700 sandys are awesome. I have a week 22 and it overclocks like poop though. 544652[/snapback] AND it overclocks like poop THOUGH... is that a good thing or a bad thing? I guess grammatically you are contradicting yourself Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkadiy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Sounds bad doesn't it? cause he said "though" that means it is good, but because of though it makes that part of it the opposite..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ir_cow Posted September 21, 2005 Posted September 21, 2005 if you look at the 3700+ which is 2.2ghz and the Fx57 which is 2.8ghz. than you can 100% for sure oc it to that speed since its the same core. the only thing holding back would be your ram and MB ocing. if indeed they can do 260+ on HTT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oralpain Posted September 21, 2005 Posted September 21, 2005 The cores are binned, many 3700+ SDs will hit 2.8Ghz just fine, but not all of them and some will need more voltage/cooling to get there. the FX55 and FX57 have san diego cores and unlocked multies, but the 4000 and below with SD cores are locked at 11-. Non-FX A64s have a maximum multiplier that is the same as the stock multiplier. CPU speed divided by 200 equals stock/max multiplier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now