sasybotnoodlehead Posted April 12, 2005 Posted April 12, 2005 DFI LANPARTY NF4SLI-DR Socket 939, 2000MT/s, nforce4 SLI, SATAII, Dual Raid, Dual Gigabit LAN, 4x Dual DDR400, UV Sensitive Slots & Cables Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-9 S939, ATX, FSB2000, PCIEx16, DUALDDR400, SATA, RAID, AC97, LAN What is the difference? Or is there one? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted April 12, 2005 Posted April 12, 2005 i heard MT/s stands for something like... mega transfers per second :s apart from that i have no idea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sasybotnoodlehead Posted April 12, 2005 Posted April 12, 2005 just great....over 200 ppl in forum and still can only get 9 hits and 1 rep. T_T <_< Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoLoDreaM Posted April 12, 2005 Posted April 12, 2005 just great....over 200 ppl in forum and still can only get 9 hits and 1 rep. T_T <_< 461120[/snapback] with that attitude, id place money that people are LESS WILLING to help you now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cchalogamer Posted April 12, 2005 Posted April 12, 2005 Well im not 100% sure of the difference they are describing, but the LanParty would be the better board jsut bc of what it is. as far as Gigabyte calling it FSB, idk why they're doing that bc in all actuallity an A64 DOESNT HAVE A FSB. Mostlikely Gigabyte is trying to label it based on ppl being used to the FSB system and not really understatning the concept of a hyper transport bus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r_target Posted April 12, 2005 Posted April 12, 2005 with that attitude, id place money that people are LESS WILLING to help you now. 461145[/snapback] For once I can say I agree with Holodream 100%. Anyway, my guess is that the 2000 refers to the HTT speed. In which case, they would be the same thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoLoDreaM Posted April 12, 2005 Posted April 12, 2005 For once I can say I agree with Holodream 100%. 461154[/snapback] haha whats that supposed to mean? yeah Dual Channel is nice to have, i can tell an improvement.. Single Channel chip PC3200 runs 3.2gb/sec and Dual Channel claims it can do 6.4gb/sec Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sasybotnoodlehead Posted April 12, 2005 Posted April 12, 2005 yea..sorry about teh attitude, thx for teh help Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now