granulf Posted January 25, 2007 Posted January 25, 2007 Why not 250x10?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruffrydaz Posted January 25, 2007 Posted January 25, 2007 because some people are saying it will affect my memory because its ddr600 and faster Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
granulf Posted January 25, 2007 Posted January 25, 2007 because some people are saying it will affect my memory because its ddr600 and faster Tell them to shove it then . 250x10 will be a lot faster than 250x9, and memory speed will be the same. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry_Games Posted January 25, 2007 Posted January 25, 2007 as I said, memory isn't important, it is that CPU Mhz that is the king on AMD's (and on Core2's really). If you read that link I provided, you would see that you have to move down the divider list pretty far before memory bandwidth starts interfering with performance. 200x12 @ 2400Mhz is going to be 1% to 3% slower than 240x10 @ 2400Mhz. And that really only depends on the program/app you are running too. 2400Mhz, no matter how you get there, is going to be better than 2300Mhz, no matter how you get there (again, unless you used such a low divider like 133 or 125 or 100, which starts to induce performance penalties) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruffrydaz Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 k thanks for the help Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now