demonR6 Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Grats! 2.9 is not a shabby number.. Did you lower the HTT multi like you said you were going to do? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Retratserif Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Show us all of your settings please, I would love to review them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Praz Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Why Small FFT? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharmedLover84 Posted September 20, 2006 Posted September 20, 2006 Doesn't Small FFT = the most CPU intensive? Also, hit 3GHz today stable enough to run benchmarks, turned it back down cuz while it was stable with the OCZ 1GB kit at 600MHz 2.5-4-4-10-1T, I popped my 2GB kit in and set it to 3-4-3-8-1T (like I always run them) and it was unstable. So I'm back at 2.9GHz... and lemme see if I can remember my settings off the top of my head. Genie BIOS Settings: FSB Bus Frequency - 200 LDT/FSB Frequency Ratio - 4.0 CPU/FSB Frequency Ratio - 14.5x PCI eXpress Frequency - 100Mhz CPU VID StartUp Value - StartUp CPU VID Control - 1.45v CPU VID Special Control - Auto LDT Voltage Control - 1.20v Chip Set Voltage Control - 1.52v DRAM Voltage Control - 2.80v DRAM Configuration Settings: DRAM Frequency Set - 250=RAM/FSB:05/04 Command Per Clock (CPC) - Enable CAS Latency Control (Tcl) - 3.0 RAS# to CAS# delay (Trcd) - 04 Bus Clocks Min RAS# active time (Tras) - 08 Bus Clocks Row precharge time (Trp) - 03 Bus Clocks Row Cycle time (Trc) - 11 Bus Clocks Row refresh cyc time (Trfc) - Auto Row to Row delay (Trrd) - 02 Bus Clocks Write recovery time (Twr) - 02 Bus Clocks Write to Read delay (Twtr) - 02 Bus Clocks Read to Write delay (Trwt) - 03 Bus Clocks Refresh Period (Tref) - 3120 Cycles Write CAS Latency (Twcl) - Auto DRAM Bank Interleave - Enabled DQS Skew Control - Auto DQS Skew Value - 0 DRAM Drive Strength - Auto DRAM Data Drive Strength - Auto Max Async Latency - 6.0 DRAM Response Time - Fast Read Preamble Time - 4.5 IdleCycle Limit - 256 Cycles Dynamic Counter - Disable R/W Queue Bypass - 16 x Bypass Max - 07 x 32 Byte Granularity - Disable(4 Bursts) Think that's right. Those settings give me ... ::finds all the screen captures:: 3DMark01SE: 3DMark03: 3DMark05: 3DMark06: Aquamark3: FEAR on Maximum/Maximum: FEAR on Maximum/Maximum @ 1600x1200: That was all run with no rebooting, same exact settings as listed above, and the Prime95 for 1 hour was run after that, during which never saw above 43C. Now if that ain't stable enough for cosure, I don't know what is And yes I'm runnin' those exact settings right now as we speak, 24/7 lol well, whenever I'm not testing out higher OCs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharmedLover84 Posted September 24, 2006 Posted September 24, 2006 Well I've had no further luck hitting 3GHz stable, I got it semi stable but not... y'know, stable stable. However I'm now runnin' 2.9GHz with my ram at 3-3-3-8-1T. It's risen my scores a weebit in benchmarks, kinda nice to see that decent of an improvement from upping the voltage on the RAM a bit and changing one number LOL I'm now gettin' 15510 in 05, 9849 in 06 and 116399 in AM3. Not too shabby for everyday settings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thraxz Posted September 25, 2006 Posted September 25, 2006 I still hate dual prime but have learned my lesson that no dual prime custom settings = BSoD. I'm still pissed off at my rig because it won't hit 3.0Ghz either. I've got to 332x9=2989 MHz on 1.58Vcore now.... in my gut I KNOW that's way too much voltage for the speed but I'm just taking it out of the picture so I can prove it's my FSB limiting me. (I've got dual prime at about 40 minutes as we speak... if it goes past 7 hours I'll call it stable and shoot for 334x9... again I know it'll fail.) OOP, it just failed at 43 minutes... just like it does with 334x9. I'm going to put it at x8 and see what happens. ANYHOW... I think you just need to give it 1.475 vcore to make it stable http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=452046 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharmedLover84 Posted September 25, 2006 Posted September 25, 2006 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=510101 that is my MAXIMUM stable OC in 06, BUT it's not stable in all benchmarks so I never bothered priming it. Maybe I should? http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=513903 My new everyday settings lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now