Jump to content

AMD FX-60 (CCB2E 0608EPDW) Overclocking Help


CharmedLover84

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Doesn't Small FFT = the most CPU intensive?

 

Also, hit 3GHz today stable enough to run benchmarks, turned it back down cuz while it was stable with the OCZ 1GB kit at 600MHz 2.5-4-4-10-1T, I popped my 2GB kit in and set it to 3-4-3-8-1T (like I always run them) and it was unstable.

 

So I'm back at 2.9GHz... and lemme see if I can remember my settings off the top of my head.

 

Genie BIOS Settings:

 

FSB Bus Frequency - 200

LDT/FSB Frequency Ratio - 4.0

CPU/FSB Frequency Ratio - 14.5x

PCI eXpress Frequency - 100Mhz

 

CPU VID StartUp Value - StartUp

 

CPU VID Control - 1.45v

CPU VID Special Control - Auto

LDT Voltage Control - 1.20v

Chip Set Voltage Control - 1.52v

DRAM Voltage Control - 2.80v

 

DRAM Configuration Settings:

 

DRAM Frequency Set - 250=RAM/FSB:05/04

Command Per Clock (CPC) - Enable

CAS Latency Control (Tcl) - 3.0

RAS# to CAS# delay (Trcd) - 04 Bus Clocks

Min RAS# active time (Tras) - 08 Bus Clocks

Row precharge time (Trp) - 03 Bus Clocks

Row Cycle time (Trc) - 11 Bus Clocks

Row refresh cyc time (Trfc) - Auto

Row to Row delay (Trrd) - 02 Bus Clocks

Write recovery time (Twr) - 02 Bus Clocks

Write to Read delay (Twtr) - 02 Bus Clocks

Read to Write delay (Trwt) - 03 Bus Clocks

Refresh Period (Tref) - 3120 Cycles

Write CAS Latency (Twcl) - Auto

DRAM Bank Interleave - Enabled

 

DQS Skew Control - Auto

DQS Skew Value - 0

DRAM Drive Strength - Auto

DRAM Data Drive Strength - Auto

Max Async Latency - 6.0

DRAM Response Time - Fast

Read Preamble Time - 4.5

IdleCycle Limit - 256 Cycles

Dynamic Counter - Disable

R/W Queue Bypass - 16 x

Bypass Max - 07 x

32 Byte Granularity - Disable(4 Bursts)

 

Think that's right.

 

Those settings give me ... ::finds all the screen captures::

 

3DMark01SE:

 

3dmark0135415od5.th.jpg

 

3DMark03:

 

3dmark0338112sf2.th.jpg

 

3DMark05:

 

3dmark0515368pq9.th.jpg

 

3DMark06:

 

3dmark069793pw2.th.jpg

 

Aquamark3:

 

aquamark3115191ba7.th.jpg

 

FEAR on Maximum/Maximum:

 

fear112by6.th.jpg

 

FEAR on Maximum/Maximum @ 1600x1200:

 

fear1600x120088kp3.th.jpg

 

That was all run with no rebooting, same exact settings as listed above, and the Prime95 for 1 hour was run after that, during which never saw above 43C.

 

Now if that ain't stable enough for cosure, I don't know what is ;)

 

And yes I'm runnin' those exact settings right now as we speak, 24/7 lol well, whenever I'm not testing out higher OCs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've had no further luck hitting 3GHz stable, I got it semi stable but not... y'know, stable stable.

 

However I'm now runnin' 2.9GHz with my ram at 3-3-3-8-1T. It's risen my scores a weebit in benchmarks, kinda nice to see that decent of an improvement from upping the voltage on the RAM a bit and changing one number LOL

 

I'm now gettin' 15510 in 05, 9849 in 06 and 116399 in AM3. Not too shabby for everyday settings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still hate dual prime but have learned my lesson that no dual prime custom settings = BSoD. I'm still pissed off at my rig because it won't hit 3.0Ghz either.

 

I've got to 332x9=2989 MHz on 1.58Vcore now.... in my gut I KNOW that's way too much voltage for the speed but I'm just taking it out of the picture so I can prove it's my FSB limiting me. (I've got dual prime at about 40 minutes as we speak... if it goes past 7 hours I'll call it stable and shoot for 334x9... again I know it'll fail.) OOP, it just failed at 43 minutes... just like it does with 334x9. I'm going to put it at x8 and see what happens.

 

ANYHOW... I think you just need to give it 1.475 vcore to make it stable

 

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=452046

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...