3700 San diego seems to be a nice overclocker!

[Guest Retratserif]

He is just teasing us. More like ah ha I dont use DFI and I get better clocks.

[SLI-DR User]

Heres my current overclock, OEM 3700+ KACE 03446EPAW . I cant go any higher tho due to my PSU limit. Specs in my sig now.

[Guest caffeinejunkie]

well it might take a few days to find out whatw as wrong with my oc database post so ill just throw a copy here for anyone whos interested:

 

 

DFI LANPARTY nF4 Ultra-D - 3/29/06

 

AMD Athlon64 3700+ Venice

 

2x512MB Muskin lvII V2 xp3200 (tccd)

 

Sapphire x800gto Fireblade 256MB, 510/1200

 

Western Digital 40GB IDE hdd (8MB cache)

 

Seagate 160gb IDE hdd (8mb cache)

 

Sintek 500W Power Supply

 

xp90 w/ Vantec 80mm Tornado

 

Evercool VC-RE

 

==========

 

 

Genie BIOS Settings:

FSB Bus Frequency - 273

LDT/FSB Frequency Ratio - 3x

CPU/FSB Frequency Ratio - 11x

PCI eXpress Frequency - 104Mhz

 

CPU VID StartUp Value - STARTUP

 

CPU VID Control - 1.225v

CPU VID Special Control - Above VID * 126%

LDT Voltage Control - 1.20v

Chip Set Voltage Control - 1.50v

DRAM Voltage Control - 2.9v

 

DRAM Configuration Settings:

DRAM Frequency Set - 180=RAM/FSB:09/10

Command Per Clock (CPC) - Enable

CAS Latency Control (Tcl) - 2.0

RAS# to CAS# delay (Trcd) - 03 Bus Clocks

Min RAS# active time (Tras) - 08 Bus Clocks

Row precharge time (Trp) - 03 Bus Clocks

Row Cycle time (Trc) - 07 Bus Clocks

Row refresh cyc time (Trfc) - 14 Bus Clocks

Row to Row delay (Trrd) - 02 Bus Clocks

Write recovery time (Twr) - 02 Bus Clocks

Write to Read delay (Twtr) - 02 Bus Clocks

Read to Write delay (Trwt) - 03 Bus Clocks

Refresh Period (Tref) - 4196 Cycles

Write CAS Latency (Twcl) - Auto

DRAM Bank Interleave - Enabled

 

DQS Skew Control - Auto

DQS Skew Value - 0

DRAM Drive Strength - Level 7

DRAM Data Drive Strength - Level 2

Max Async Latency - 8.0 Nano Seconds

DRAM Response Time - Fast

Read Preamble Time - 5.0 Nano Seconds

IdleCycle Limit - 000 Cycles

Dynamic Counter - Disable

R/W Queue Bypass - 16 x

Bypass Max - 07 x

32 Byte Granularity - Disable(4 Bursts)

 

 

==========

 

 

Prime95 + 3dMark2001SE + CPU-Z 1.33.1:

 

 

 

3dMark2003:

 

 

 

3dMark2005:

 

 

Everest:

 

 

SuperPI 1.5 1m:

 

 

Suicide @ 3313mhz:

 

 

 

 

 

==========

 

 

 

short description:

273x11 @ 3003Mhz, 1.225v + 126%

2-3-3-8 @ 2.9v vdimm

[Guest EFiNi7]

are you running defaults on all the 3dmark scores??? They seem pretty low for that sort of speed

[Guest caffeinejunkie]

Yeah im running defaults

 

second monitor disabled

 

card at 510/1200

 

I think it's just my x800gtblow :nod: just kidding it's a wonderful card but it's getting replaced by an x1800gto in a few months

[KimTjik]

well it might take a few days to find out whatw as wrong with my oc database post so ill just throw a copy here for anyone whos interested:

Hm, I can't say for sure, but I suppose the first screen with Prime95 successfully ran should be a real captured screen. As it looks now it could as well be a result of a simple photo-editor.

 

Of course, if someone really wants to fool us with bogus results it's possible - but what good does it make? - nevertheless I suppose you could put an effort into catching real screens.

[Guest caffeinejunkie]

What do you mean real screens?

 

All I do is hit printscreen then resize it a bit in paint

 

I figured why put up 2560x1024 pictures when I can chop them up a bit

 

and why would I lie?

 

theres no prizes

 

I dont get anything for posting it

 

I would just be cheating myself

 

and I think my low scores are due to some corrupted drivers so Im gonna do some formatin tonight

[KimTjik]

What do you mean real screens?

 

All I do is hit printscreen then resize it a bit in paint

 

I figured why put up 2560x1024 pictures when I can chop them up a bit

 

and why would I lie?

 

theres no prizes

 

I dont get anything for posting it

 

I would just be cheating myself

 

and I think my low scores are due to some corrupted drivers so Im gonna do some formatin tonight

No need to take offence.

 

I haven't said you lied or anything like that, I simply tried to figure out why your post in the "OC database" would have been deleted.

 

I simply added the comment about fixed results, because I wanted to make the exact same point as you did.

 

I still think it could be good to see that screen bearing some resemblance of a computer screen.

[Guest caffeinejunkie]

No need to take offence.

 

I haven't said you lied or anything like that, I simply tried to figure out why your post in the "OC database" would have been deleted.

 

I simply added the comment about fixed results, because I wanted to make the exact same point as you did.

 

I still think it could be good to see that screen bearing some resemblance of a computer screen.

 

I didnt take any offence or anything

 

not editing the pic doesnt give you much more

 

 

I use litestep so I really dont have a traditional desktop look

 

no explorer.exe fo me

[KimTjik]

Oh, that's why. Ok for me it looks very familiar since I use blackbox and fluxbox in Linux on not so powerful computers.

 

I was just guessing. Try to contact some moderater if it's still a mystery to why you can't post your results.

 

Even if you use litestep I believe it's possible to switch between setups if you really want to. So I don't think it's such a big deal.

 

Good luck!

 

I'm out...

[Guest Retratserif]

Nice caffeinejunkie!!! Thats what I wanted to see.

 

Now is it possible to get that clock with 2*1gb sticks?

 

I have some good 512 ballistix's that should be able to get those clocks but my 1gb OCZ DDR500's may not be able to. I really hope I can do that.

 

Cant wait untill this damn Expert board stop with the stupid 3LED's.

[Guest caffeinejunkie]

Well that speed is achievable but probably not with those timings

 

if you want to see some of the best 2gb kits check out this thread from OCC

 

2x1gb Competition

 

Ill be getting some pc4000 gskill HZ soon with an x1800xt for my next upgrade

 

I cant wait