computerfreakxv Posted June 29, 2002 Posted June 29, 2002 Well Bosco is right SONY computers do suck...and they are so ugly...but AMD is still the way to go...Hey you pay less with AMD for somthing that is better... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted June 29, 2002 Posted June 29, 2002 Oh ya there better all right LOL they just got smoked by a intel 2.8. It is so bad they really far behind but oh well they always have. B) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
computerfreakxv Posted June 30, 2002 Posted June 30, 2002 If AMD had a 2.8gig processor against a Intel 2.8gig processor...you know that AMD would beat Intel so bad...but they dont...give them credit for what they have. AMD's latest chip the 2200 t-bred is only a 1.8 gig processor ,but it can easily out perform a Intel 1.8 - 1.9 - 2.0 - 2.1 - 2.2 - 2.3 - 2.4gig processor and so on...you get the picture...you know,thats really sad...even when the stats on the Intel chip is better it still is out performed by a mear 1.8 gig processor... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
computerfreakxv Posted June 30, 2002 Posted June 30, 2002 Oh yeah and one more thing...thats without (OVERCLOCKING)...its sad really Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATI Radeon 8500 Posted June 30, 2002 Posted June 30, 2002 Um...and I will admit it is possible that your computer is running faster but you have to consider that my computer is running a 100 Mhz FSB versus a 133 Mhz FSB on an AMD. My chip would be running 2666 Mhz with a 533 FSB for the CPU if my motherboard FSB was set to 133 Mhz...I'l see the 1.73 beat that;)! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
computerfreakxv Posted June 30, 2002 Posted June 30, 2002 The t-bred is...1.8gig...not 1.73 <_ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
computerfreakxv Posted June 30, 2002 Posted June 30, 2002 OverClocking is the key word...the other day I was reading a review on the t-bred and this guy got it up to 2.8 easy(with the right cooling)...he said that it was no problem he could have gone more but he thought he had made his point (that AMD is better of coures)...lol...I really dont have nothing against the Intel chips I think that Intel and AMD will always be pretty much side by side...and intel might go on alittle ahead of AMD but AMD always seems to catch right back up...it will be like this till the end of time...but till then ill stick with AMD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
computerfreakxv Posted June 30, 2002 Posted June 30, 2002 I mean everybody has there own oppinion.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted June 30, 2002 Posted June 30, 2002 It all comes down to whats under the hood really. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
computerfreakxv Posted June 30, 2002 Posted June 30, 2002 LOL...and we all no whos got the money has got the best system... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
computerfreakxv Posted June 30, 2002 Posted June 30, 2002 *clears throat*....Bosco Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted June 30, 2002 Posted June 30, 2002 Very true. The more money ya got the faster you can make your machine go. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now