Kamikaze_Badger Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 That's not something alterable, and they can believe what they wish. However, he was not only aiding the market, but he immersed himself in an area of children to fantasize about them with his vore and cub kinks. He is a pedophile. He immersed himself among children to feed his fetish. He aided in the destruction of the innocent lives of children. The only good that may come of this is the busting of child porn rings so a larger hit can be taken against them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bionix Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 His fetish is not something alterable either... and why is it a problem if he never acts on this fetish? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
martymcfly Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 (edited) http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/new...egion-apnewyork the story was picked up by AP ICE agents seized a laptop and a desktop computer and several external hard drives, where they subsequently found 70 still images and 42 video clips depicting children engaged in sexually explicit activities, prosecutors said. I was with him when he bought one of the external HDs. edit: oh, and Bionix, I'd say this is a problem: Federal agents say Reinard also had a Web site where he talked about running a camp for young men, who would be trained as slaves and eaten. Edited September 28, 2006 by martymcfly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bionix Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 Young Men? as in over 18? I see no problem in that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
martymcfly Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 (edited) Young Men? as in over 18? I see no problem in that. trained as slaves and eaten. edit: video: http://news12.com/LI/topstories/article?id=182846# Edited September 28, 2006 by martymcfly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze_Badger Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 His fetish is not something alterable either... and why is it a problem if he never acts on this fetish? He did, by purchasing the child pornography and taking up a job around children in order to entertain himself with his vore fetish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyrcks9901 Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 KB, you are under 18 correct? Do you have sexual fantasies about other people your age? I assume you do and that is going to be the thesis of my little mini-lecture here. People in the united states see children as these innocent little people that should be guarded against everything. But the truth is that children are not innocent. Sure, maybe young children, like under 12-13 years old, but after that kids are just as capable as adults are of concieving and giving birth. I completely agree with the rest of you about most of what happened. I believe that it is wrong that he had child pornography of young children and that he was also a teacher of young children. And of course, he should be prosecuted for it. But I don't think that he should be sentenced to death. The only problem I see with what he did, is that he had pornography of YOUNG children. But not all children are "innocent." EDIT: Oh, and the cannibalism is gross. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Flashstar Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 All children as well as adults are "innocent until proven guilty". Just because a child is going through puberty does not mean that he is guilty. It is simply a way of life, and I assume that you went through it too... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyrcks9901 Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 Yes, some are innocent even as late as their teens. But they are no longer innocent the instant they start having sexual fantasies which usually occurs around puberty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Flashstar Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 Yes, some are innocent even as late as their teens. But they are no longer innocent the instant they start having sexual fantasies which usually occurs around puberty. Why? So you are saying that you aren't innocent? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyrcks9901 Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 No, I'm definately not innocent. First of all, I'm in very serious relationship with someone. I've done a few drugs recreationally, and I've broken quite a few laws. So, no, I'm not innocent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fireonice Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 Im sorta with bionix on this one. I agree he should be charged for having child porn, ect. but sentensed to death.... no From what i read he never acually had any sexual contact with his students and if the kids are laughing when he says im going to eat you then they know its a joke there for i dont see the wrong in that. And personaly i wouldnt mind him being my son or daughters teacher or even my own as long as the teacher stays to himself then i dont see whats wrong (sorta like gay people). Now im rambeling so il stop. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now