y-cruncher: new multi-threaded benchmark

[Andrewr05]

Odd. I wouldn't have expected mine to perform that much better considering it's essentially the same chip. I wonder if it's faster b/c I'm running 7 x64?

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that the issue as I'm running Xp 32bit.

 

 

It even says when you start the test that that isn't optimal:

 

 

What is your memory running at as well?

[Flibo]

Oh, right! I'm running Vista 32-bit, the nightmare for benching. Also my memory is 800MHz (although running at 960MHz on the pic), maybe that affects a bit?

[Savan]

25M - 50 seconds ... good thing Im planing an upgrade for Christmas

[Bosco]

25 - 9.5

50 - 20.12

100 - 43.289

500 - 257.417

 

I7 920 @ 3.6

[Waco]

Wow! How can you get so much better results with a Q6600 than my Q9300!?

32 bit == fail.

 

Mine is a Q6600 @ 3.2 as well.

 

25 - 9.5

50 - 20.12

100 - 43.289

500 - 257.417

 

I7 920 @ 3.6

Damn. That i7 can really crank out digits of pi! Is that with 8 threads or 4?

Edited December 12, 2009 by Waco

[Bosco]

32 bit == fail.

 

Mine is a Q6600 @ 3.2 as well.

 

 

Damn. That i7 can really crank out digits of pi! Is that with 8 threads or 4?

 

I did 8 should I be doing 4?

[damian]

 

25 - 14.502

 

AMD Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.4GHz (not bad at all for stock!)

 

I like this program Can't wait for a thread specifically for submitting scores

 

 

 

EDIT: Tried for a third run

 

25M - 13.826

Edited December 12, 2009 by damian

[Andrewr05]

Can't wait for a thread specifically for submitting scores

 

Should I make the thread one big combined list so everyone is competing against each other, one big list per manufacturer, or broken down between series?

 

 

I was thinking something like this:

 

AMD:

Phenom IIs

 

Phenoms

 

Athlons

 

HELP ME EXPAND THIS SECTION!

I'm an AMD n00b!

 

 

INTEL:

 

iSERIES (i5/i7) -

 

C2Q-

 

C2D-

 

Core Solo-

 

Atom Variants-

 

Older Intel chips (Pentium Dual Core/Celeron, Pentium 4, Pentium 3 etc) -

[nVidia_Freak]

I think it should be colour coded like the 3DMark Competition thread.

 

Quad Core - Red

Dual Core - Orange

Single Core - Yellow

 

Then the results sorted by digits computed. See below:

 

Results Key:

Red - Quad Core

Orange - Dual Core

Yellow - Single Core

 

25 Million Digits

contestant x - 8.544

contestant y - 11.155

contestant z - 16.457

 

50 Million Digits

etc.

 

And so on..

 

Of course we can have a nice table as Smith has in the 3DMark thread.

Edited December 13, 2009 by nVidia_Freak

[Kash]

Huh? It just calculates Pi, it's a benchmark.

 

 

EDIT:

 

14.7 seconds for 25M, 30.7 seconds for 50M. Nice! Looks like my high FSB will finally mean something.

 

Running a billion digits in the background now. This should be fun.

 

I got 17.43 seconds for 25M on my stock Q6600

[Andrewr05]

SCORE THREAD

[Waco]

I did 8 should I be doing 4?

If it's faster I don't see the problem with doing 8.