Andrewr05 Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Odd. I wouldn't have expected mine to perform that much better considering it's essentially the same chip. I wonder if it's faster b/c I'm running 7 x64?Yeah, I'm pretty sure that the issue as I'm running Xp 32bit. It even says when you start the test that that isn't optimal: What is your memory running at as well? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flibo Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Oh, right! I'm running Vista 32-bit, the nightmare for benching. Also my memory is 800MHz (although running at 960MHz on the pic), maybe that affects a bit? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savan Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 25M - 50 seconds ... good thing Im planing an upgrade for Christmas Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 25 - 9.5 50 - 20.12 100 - 43.289 500 - 257.417 I7 920 @ 3.6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 (edited) Wow! How can you get so much better results with a Q6600 than my Q9300!? 32 bit == fail. Mine is a Q6600 @ 3.2 as well. 25 - 9.550 - 20.12 100 - 43.289 500 - 257.417 I7 920 @ 3.6 Damn. That i7 can really crank out digits of pi! Is that with 8 threads or 4? Edited December 12, 2009 by Waco Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 32 bit == fail. Mine is a Q6600 @ 3.2 as well. Damn. That i7 can really crank out digits of pi! Is that with 8 threads or 4? I did 8 should I be doing 4? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damian Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 (edited) 25 - 14.502 AMD Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.4GHz (not bad at all for stock!) I like this program Can't wait for a thread specifically for submitting scores EDIT: Tried for a third run 25M - 13.826 Edited December 12, 2009 by damian Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Can't wait for a thread specifically for submitting scores Should I make the thread one big combined list so everyone is competing against each other, one big list per manufacturer, or broken down between series? I was thinking something like this: AMD: Phenom IIs Phenoms Athlons HELP ME EXPAND THIS SECTION! I'm an AMD n00b! INTEL: iSERIES (i5/i7) - C2Q- C2D- Core Solo- Atom Variants- Older Intel chips (Pentium Dual Core/Celeron, Pentium 4, Pentium 3 etc) - Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nVidia_Freak Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 (edited) I think it should be colour coded like the 3DMark Competition thread. Quad Core - Red Dual Core - Orange Single Core - Yellow Then the results sorted by digits computed. See below: Results Key:Red - Quad Core Orange - Dual Core Yellow - Single Core 25 Million Digits contestant x - 8.544 contestant y - 11.155 contestant z - 16.457 50 Million Digits etc. And so on.. Of course we can have a nice table as Smith has in the 3DMark thread. Edited December 13, 2009 by nVidia_Freak Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kash Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Huh? It just calculates Pi, it's a benchmark. EDIT: 14.7 seconds for 25M, 30.7 seconds for 50M. Nice! Looks like my high FSB will finally mean something. Running a billion digits in the background now. This should be fun. I got 17.43 seconds for 25M on my stock Q6600 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 SCORE THREAD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 I did 8 should I be doing 4? If it's faster I don't see the problem with doing 8. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now