purist Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20041001/index.html This article tells how to convert an Athlon XP to an XP mobile. Anyway, has anyone used this to create a more stable XP chip at otherwise XP-M only clock speeds? Does this conversion force the XP chip to require less voltage to run its stock clock speed (or overclocked speeds for that matter)? This must have been tried before. What are the findings? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black99RT Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 The mobile coversion mod is primarily used to convert factory locked chips to mobiles, so that users can use AMDs powernow! feature to change multiplyers in software. I am not sure if hardlocked chips with this mod can do hardware level multiplyer cahnges. I do not believe this would be of any good to you because you already run the 10x multi (Is that stock or lowered?) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
purist Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 that is lowered. stock is 10.5. I guess the only way it would be beneficial is if all of a sudden it made the chip run at a lower "required" voltage. Meaning, I could obtain the same clock that I'm at now only it would be with a lower voltage ( like a real mobile chip does it!) and therefore more stable. Is this correct? Is my thinking right? Will my chip always be forced to be a 1.65 volt chip (stock voltage) or will this mod force it to run stable at 1.45(stock mobile voltage)? It sure would be great to have a toaster sig with a 3000 chip! Chris Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black99RT Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 This mod will not affect the manufactured core quality of your chip at all. It will perform the same clock at the same voltage as it did before the mod, there is no reason for you personally to do it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
purist Posted December 13, 2004 Posted December 13, 2004 alright. well it was a nice thought. putting it that way de-mystifies it though. that's for sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now