Andrewr05 Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 y-cruncher This is NOT another HyperPi-like program that runs multiple computations to satisfy all cores. This program uses multiple cores to compute a SINGLE result - much faster. Copied from Xtremesystems.org, all credit goes there. Lets all run it and see if we like it, if we do I'll make another thread for scores. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 25.013 seconds for 25M digits: 50.953 seconds for 50M digits: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nanoprobe Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Is this program only for F@H users or will work on WCG BOINC units? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 (edited) Is this program only for F@H users or will work on WCG BOINC units? Huh? It just calculates Pi, it's a benchmark. EDIT: 14.7 seconds for 25M, 30.7 seconds for 50M. Nice! Looks like my high FSB will finally mean something. Running a billion digits in the background now. This should be fun. Edited December 12, 2009 by Waco Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nanoprobe Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Huh? It just calculates Pi, it's a benchmark. My bad! I thought it was for processing units. Still learning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 (edited) Nice! 948.432 seconds for 1 BILLION digits of pi with a multi-core efficiency of 92.2711% and 369.084% CPU utilization! That's with me just browsing a bit in the background. Me likey! Edited December 12, 2009 by Waco Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrewr05 Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 20.351 seconds for 25M: X3220 at 3Ghz- Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Odd. I wouldn't have expected mine to perform that much better considering it's essentially the same chip. I wonder if it's faster b/c I'm running 7 x64? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flibo Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 (edited) 17,6226 seconds for 25M on my 24/7 clocks. 38,0558 seconds for 50M. That's with a Q9300 running on 3,43 GHz EDIT: Did someone say high FSB? (setFSB is open, but I didn't touch a thing on it... Otherwise the result would screw up) Edited December 12, 2009 by Flibo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nVidia_Freak Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 (edited) 25m 13.887s Q6600 @ 3.2 (400x8) 50m 30.195 Q6600 @ 3.2 (400x8) Edited December 12, 2009 by nVidia_Freak Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flibo Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Wow! How can you get so much better results with a Q6600 than my Q9300!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nVidia_Freak Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 And here's 500m, since I don't have enough RAM to go further. 500m 416.709s Q6600 @ 3.2 (400x8) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now