flexy Posted May 31, 2005 Posted May 31, 2005 hi, just back from vacation and i see there are some newer beta bios for the nf4-lp out. Just confused which one to flash for my REV2s ...the 5/10-02 or the -03 ? I have two sticks of OCZ rev2 plats in slots 2 and 4 thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantompunisher Posted May 31, 2005 Posted May 31, 2005 not too much word on the 5/10 with tccd. i tryed 5/10-1 and -3 and went back to 4/14-1 for my highest overclock. just my small experience. this is with g.skill and a san diago 3700+ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest scott Posted June 3, 2005 Posted June 3, 2005 510-2 seems to be working for me, with OCZ plat EL Rev 2 PC3200. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexy Posted June 3, 2005 Posted June 3, 2005 i just flashed 510-2, DESPITES the fact that i read on many occasions that -2 is for UT/BTT ram only. But then i see many people with REV2 sticks who have good results with the -2 bios. So i just flashed it. So far so good. Didnt see any problems with it, and the booting/IDE detection in bios is definitly faster than before. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantompunisher Posted June 3, 2005 Posted June 3, 2005 yup very strange. just went to 510-2 myself and its definatly 100 times more stable then the -1 or -3 on my setup. to early to tell but it looks to be giving the same overclock as 414-1. so im sold! i think i see quicker boots like people are talking but its ever so slight if at all Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mucker Posted June 4, 2005 Posted June 4, 2005 510-2 for my Mushkin TCCD on BP. Compared to 3/10, this bios has allowed me to tighten timings and generally feels alot more snappy in all areas... m Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexy Posted June 4, 2005 Posted June 4, 2005 510-2 for my Mushkin TCCD on BP. Compared to 3/10, this bios has allowed me to tighten timings and generally feels alot more snappy in all areas... m did you try to set your TRAS to 6 or 7 (instead of your 5, this sounds kind of too low for nf4)....maybe you could get some higher clocks ? 2.5-3-3-6(7) at 250 or so mhz should NOT be any problem for TCCD... I personally i am already very tired from tweaking and stability testing...but from what i see the 510-2 is at least as good as the last one i had (414-something, i think it was -3 )....and i can run 260 2.5 3 3 6 OCCT stable and now i am testing 289 2.5 4 3 7 Edit: oh i saw your other posting....ok Just wondering about your TRAS of 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mucker Posted June 4, 2005 Posted June 4, 2005 Yeah, my Winchester gets wacky over 2.54 no matter what I do, so I just settled where I am at. The timing/htt is a wash for me at the same CPU freq, so I chose the tighter timings, which are plenty good for me.... m Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexy Posted June 5, 2005 Posted June 5, 2005 Yeah, my Winchester gets wacky over 2.54 no matter what I do, so I just settled where I am at. The timing/htt is a wash for me at the same CPU freq, so I chose the tighter timings, which are plenty good for me.... m yeah no way i can get mine over 2610 which is already extremely on the edge, few mhz more is a nono. But i am rather trying to get my OCZ REV2 sticks at 289 to 2.5 3 3 7 instead of 2.5 4 3 7.....but after millions of tweaks and tries i think this will always be a dream. So..i can either run 289 2.5 4 3 7 or 10x261 and 2.5 3 3 6.....really not much a real world difference what i chose there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dexx Posted June 15, 2005 Posted June 15, 2005 510-2 for my Mushkin TCCD on BP. Compared to 3/10, this bios has allowed me to tighten timings and generally feels alot more snappy in all areas... m Any updates on this? Are you still happiest with 510-2? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantompunisher Posted June 16, 2005 Posted June 16, 2005 i switched back to 4/14-1 because i was getting random blue screens. not sure if the bios was the problem but ill see i they stop now. yes for what ever reason 4/14-1 has stopped my blue screens. must be some auto setting i dont know to change on the 5/12 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobraKai Posted June 17, 2005 Posted June 17, 2005 i switched back to 4/14-1 because i was getting random blue screens. not sure if the bios was the problem but ill see i they stop now 510-X are good especially since they support the new upcoming X2 cores [Manchester and Toledo] and also support the yellow slots for high voltage ram but for me 414-3 and 310P are still the better bios versions to date. You should give the new 615 a try they just came out, Im testing them right now. http://www.dfi-street.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14342 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now