RADEON Posted January 3, 2006 Posted January 3, 2006 (edited) http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200501/clarke i read this and it really struck a cord. what if security measures have to be taken this far? Edited January 3, 2006 by RADEON Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Raven65 Posted January 3, 2006 Posted January 3, 2006 That is a very liberal editorial. For one Bush was not in office when the plan was plotted. They need to blame Clinton's orginazation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze_Badger Posted January 3, 2006 Posted January 3, 2006 Too much bigotry for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoArmistead Posted January 3, 2006 Posted January 3, 2006 You can go ahead and silence that chord, it's worrying about nothing, radeon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RADEON Posted January 3, 2006 Posted January 3, 2006 (edited) obviosly its a very,very,very,extremely far vetched view of what could happen but what if? my piont for posting this is just that. what if?just imagine living like that. Edited January 3, 2006 by RADEON Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoArmistead Posted January 3, 2006 Posted January 3, 2006 It would suck. Horribly . Seems like a lot of those people (like the guy who wrote that article) tend to base their assumptions on "what if." From the future of Iraq to the NSA wiretapping suspected domestic terrorists, they always use the "what if" scenario. I prefer to use the "what is" or the "what has been" scenario, it works better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now