uneven multipler resulting memory frequencies table

[qlr]

I read many post about not useing uneven multiplers becouse your memory will be slower, but noone posted *exactly how slower*... so i will do it

 

The compessed workbook is too large (100+ pages) to be attached, but you can get it here - happy uneven multiing :shake:

 

You need Exel to view the workbook, if you don't have it here is a free Office solution (i use it too): ooffice

 

here is a screenshot of it:

 

hope u like it.....if not...plz don't kill me....i was bored at work, and needed something to do.....

[Guest caffeinejunkie]

Very nice and informative post. But the fact that the memory runs slower w/ half steps isnt really the reason that people advise against it. A64s period just do not like half step multis. Im pretty sure it has something to do with the on-die memory controller. But excellent post .

[Burky]

I thought the reason was that it simply wasn't as stable as an integral multi.

Thanks for doing the table though, very useful.

[qlr]

lol i jut found out that there is an app that calculates the frequencies......so this was like a stupid post