Guest FZ1 Posted December 6, 2005 Posted December 6, 2005 This is an old thread but has anyone further *proven* this? I seem to have better luck using the special but it could be some other factors. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Crusader Posted December 6, 2005 Posted December 6, 2005 Interesting stuff, I always thought CPU Special Vid was to give you voltages that are more finely tuned to what you need as opposed to the selectable voltages. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Sz Posted December 6, 2005 Posted December 6, 2005 hum... I didn't think they were that high from looking in the OC database I'm now running an XP-90, duing load my cpu temps are steady at 53c No offense but that is just dumb. Why run your chip 24/7 at the abolute max temp? For all you know the temp is being measured wrong and your chip is slowly frying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squid1 Posted December 7, 2005 Posted December 7, 2005 I played with overclocking at the same net voltage made up either by just core voltage or by lower core and using special on top. There was not a single MHz of overclocking difference, and my DMM says I get what I say I want precisely. I tested that with two CPUs, although I don't remember which ones, I think my CABYE Opteron and my Venice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
i3dmaster Posted December 7, 2005 Posted December 7, 2005 Interesting. I will give it a try and see if there is any difference Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FZ1 Posted December 7, 2005 Posted December 7, 2005 There was not a single MHz of overclocking difference, and my DMM says I get what I say I want precisely. I wouldn't expect there to be a difference. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fletcherea Posted December 7, 2005 Posted December 7, 2005 shouldnt make much a diff at all, it would be the same as having a two settings to change the tenths and hundreths >shrug Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wardog Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 This is an old thread but has anyone further *proven* this? I seem to have better luck using the special but it could be some other factors. Some MSI boards have this as well. My old Neo2 Plat's would make fine use of the feature. I can't find it right now, but there is a post(MSI Forums?) postulating rather knowledgeably of MB circuits in setting voltages and the advantages to "adding' in this fashion. .. Rick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
granulf Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 Interesting thread, I just had to try it myself . So far I'm dual priming @ 2.8ghz 1.425V x 107.2%.(approx. 1.53V) Normally I'm running at straight 1.55V, so maybe this can be a better setting? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsAs1n8eR Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 I didn't see any diffrence abck when I was using my nf3 DFI. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now