Jump to content

The truth about Tras and its dangers....


Guest shaolin95_merged

Recommended Posts

Guest shaolin95

Glad it helped and yes next time I should look at the sigs lol Lucky you that half dividers arent a strange thing with your rig.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest shaolin95

Is that suposed to make me feel bad or do you have a point? I never said it was new or even my ideas, just that so many people were still doing it wrong that I decided to bring it back for discussion...thanks anyway for your very helpful post....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have tested 2.5-3-3-8 but i can't see any difference. And @tras 7. It's ran 24h and i didn't see any incorrupt drive reading or any problem with my drive. Now i run my setting 2.5-4-3-7 without any problems. I don't know. It's tras 8 better than tras7 about a safer system or not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest shaolin95

Corruption isnt going to show up just like that...think of it as a cancer...slowly killing your drive and by the time you noticed any symptoms its usually too late.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it's unsafe because windows crashes. I set down to 2.5-3-3-6 FSB270. I don't understand why i can't set the FSB up to 280 stable. I tried different settings but 2.5-4-3-7 was 80% stable (only very hard CPU stressed programs like games crashes my system). Why why why why?

 

Edit: The next test is 2.5-4-4-8 (it's slower than with 3-3-6 about Trcd is faster with 3 than with 4).

 

It's maybe the Bios? I have 3/25 shall i downgrade it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SO i have tested 2.5-4-4-8 FSB280x9 it's stable but if i set it to 2.5-3-3-8 then memtest shows errors. I tried to set FSB on 290x9 with 4-4-8 but no chance. Memtest shows no errors but i can't boot windows (2 BSODs 1 time bootvid.ini and another a information to set shadow off or cache lower). The same with 3-3-8. Memtest shows errors. No chance?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont think the 9x multiplier works for 2 sticks of ram... only 1 stick works on 9x mult... i tried it before... at 255x10 no errors.. 255x9 thousands of errors... dont know why it does this... but when i tried 1 stick.. my 9x error dissappear...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont think the 9x multiplier works for 2 sticks of ram... only 1 stick works on 9x mult... i tried it before... at 255x10 no errors.. 255x9 thousands of errors... dont know why it does this... but when i tried 1 stick.. my 9x error dissappear...

 

I have tested 2 sticks with 10x270. It's not stable but 9x270 and higher. It's stable. I don't now exactly how my ram works (after the memtest i think they work 1:1).

 

Now i use Bios 310. It runs stable FSB280x9 ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...