red930 Posted June 22, 2005 Posted June 22, 2005 That's not much faster than a quill pen on papyrus! lol My 5400rpm samsung on my other computer. I hate waiting for windows to startup :drool: And it's louder than both my 36gb raptor and 74gb raptor combined! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vega27 Posted June 22, 2005 Posted June 22, 2005 LMAO thanks for the perspective, travis! great CPU utilization, tho! :shake: why isn't winblows on one of your raptors? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Posted June 26, 2005 Posted June 26, 2005 LMAO thanks for the perspective, travis! great CPU utilization, tho! :shake: why isn't winblows on one of your raptors? I have x64 on my 36gb and xp on my 74gb both in the computer on my sig, yes and great cpu utilization lol it made me laugh when I saw it, that hard drive is so slow it has no effect on the cpu :shake: . Oh and it's Trevor not Travis, I hate it when people call me Travis . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
passionne Posted June 26, 2005 Posted June 26, 2005 I followed the results edited in this thread which drove me to choose 4 Hitachi SATA II that I installed in RAID 0, instead of 2x74 GB Raptor 10000 rpm and I am very satisfied : my results are below. What is your opinion ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffP Posted June 26, 2005 Posted June 26, 2005 I followed the results edited in this thread which drove me to choose 4 Hitachi SATA II that I installed in RAID 0, instead of 2x74 GB Raptor 10000 rpm and I am very satisfied : my results are below. What is your opinion ? Change your settings from Overlap to Neither and total length to 32MB. That will keep your score consistant with the rest of results on here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Posted June 26, 2005 Posted June 26, 2005 Wow beats my Samsung by 7.2 times in average read speed, but you can't beat my cpu utilization! :shake: And btw you should use Alt+Print Screen to capture only the window in focus . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
passionne Posted June 26, 2005 Posted June 26, 2005 Here are my corrected results : Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Posted June 26, 2005 Posted June 26, 2005 I said alt+print screen so you dont have to have all that extra crap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
passionne Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 OK, thanks. What do you think of my results ? Indeed, 32 k read result is bad. Why ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickS Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 Seagate Barracuda SATA 80GB w/ 8MB Cache, 7200RPM on Port 3 (NVRAID Controller) Hitachi DeskStar PATA 80GB w/ 2MB Cache, 7200RPM on Primary ATA 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
txmale36 Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 i got 354 megs/s with 2 hitachi sata 2s ncq. using hd tach benchmark tool. im trying to figure out how to post the screen shot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oliveryochest Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 2 74 raptors EDIT: jpg now. sorry bout that http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a142/oliveryochest/RW.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now