Jump to content

This BIOS Update Didn't Work


BigStan
 Share

Recommended Posts

This BIOS update for the 875P-T didn't work. I did exactly what it said. Formatted a blank new floppy, ran 75TLDA01.exe. It worked on the floppy for a few minutes then indicated it was done. I booted directly to the floppy. It read and read and then started up. It tried to update the BIOS, then stopped and said my "BIOS ROM was write protected ~press F10". So I did. Then it said I had the "wrong BIOS for this update". Glad it was smart enough to figure that out and not hose my BIOS.

 

This is what I have ~ It should have updated. What do I try next?

 

 

DFI 875P-7 MOBO

550 ~ 3.4 Proc

SATA RAID

2x512 Adata 4000

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well I figured out that there is a setting in the BIOS that blocks it from being flashed. I changed that setting and I was able to successfully flash my BIOS.

 

However, even though the "Lock Free" option appears in my BIOS now, it does not work. I set it to 14, but when I boot, it sets it back to 17. What is the trick to using this feature?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If custo0mer asked why he can not save the setting of lower multiplier or frequency ratio, please reconfirm with him whether he had enabled “Minimize FMB15 CPU ratio”. Please also be advised that this feature is only workable for CPU conforming to FMB1.5. At present, the minimum speed is 3.4G. I will add this note on BIOS download page.

 

 

 

Best,

 

 

 

HH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I could not get it to work was because it is not explained anywhere how to use it. Everyone's knee jerk reaction will be to type "14" where the "17" it. That doesn't work. You have to select the "Lock Free" option that is next on the page. Then you select "Enable". It will then select the 14 for you. Now that I have figured it out, it works. Well sorta. I have found a couple of bugs. One is that when you are in "14" multiplier and slect DDR320 for the mem frequency, the BIOS will default to fsb 200 no matter what fsb you attempt to use. The other is the ddr266 doesn't work at all.

 

Also, fwiw, the CPU bandwidth as measured by Sandra INT is way slower for the 14 multi at the same proc speed. For example, if you get up to a proc speed of 3.8 and swap back and forth between 14 & 17, ~ 14 is way slower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bump ~ How do we get the bugs in the BIOS reported so then can get fixed?

 

I have found a couple of bugs. One is that when you are in "14" multiplier and slect DDR320 for the mem frequency, the BIOS will default to fsb 200 no matter what fsb you attempt to use. The other is the ddr266 doesn't work at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the bios to change ratio/multi is only a beta bios and will always be a beta bios. Intel highly frowns upon overclocking of these cpu/chipsets, which is why they locked the chipset to max10% (and we, asus, abit, everyone else unlocked it)

 

if its a beta that might make it to official, then we'd take bug reports...but this bios is not one that is ever going to be official because of chipzilla's stance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Angry_Games

the bios to change ratio/multi is only a beta bios and will always be a beta bios. Intel highly frowns upon overclocking of these cpu/chipsets, which is why they locked the chipset to max10% (and we, asus, abit, everyone else unlocked it)

 

if its a beta that might make it to official, then we'd take bug reports...but this bios is not one that is ever going to be official because of chipzilla's stance.

I would bet that the guy that worte this BIOS would be happy to know he left a bug in it. I haven't yet met a programmer that does not care about writting a quality product. I'm sure he would like to know what needs to be fixed. And I'm sure there must be a way to let him know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Intel highly frowns upon overclocking of these cpu/chipsets, which is why they locked the chipset to max10% (and we, asus, abit, everyone else unlocked it)

Hello Guys,

Ok, I know this is true for 915/925, but surely the 875 Canterwood did not have these restrictions?

 

I am fortunate to have a ES 3.4EE cpu, and am eagerly awaiting my DFI 875P-T's arrival, so I hope in future that this bios would be sorted if I plan on using a Pressie cpu rather.

 

BigStan, keep us posted, and let us know what your results are. If you keep your multi at it's original setting, what is your overclocks like? Still limited to the 10%...which it should not be?

 

Br,

MrBean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...