BessenOlli Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 What will I have to set in Winflash? Is a flash with Winflash not the same as with awdflash? Less good? thx Greets Olli Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
slavik Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 awdflash > winflash Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BessenOlli Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 i made it with winflash for now because atm i doesnt have any floppy discs. but the problem i had is still there. i can reach the 200 FSB only with less agressive memory timings as my mushkins MUST take. will this problem be away if i will do it with awdflash? or is it another problem? btw: what is a warmod? greets oliver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RGone Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 ...RGone...does not have a method. RGone ran some tests on his personal board and did it X way. That is all. I reported what I did. It does not make it RGone...'s way. Maybe not even a way. From here on out I am evaluating how I am going to post. It is very likely that I will be testing but there will be no post of the results. I am not going to post in speed results or give any benchmark results. There are too many people who think because I can do it or in fact do do whatever that they can do it. That is not so. I tested the CH-5 just to see what it would do. Not what anyone else would 'surely' do. It was an exercise in what "might" possibly if the stars were in alignment>be done by someone else. Not a sure thing by any means. So when it becomes RGone...'s way that is going to get someone past 200FSB that is a result of settings probably and not the bios at all> it is time for RGone... to change his posting procedure. I think there will be no more posting that in anyway can be mis-construed as my way. You guys do it the recommended way. I am not going to post results so there will be no way to mis-think. Let the average forum user post results if they desire> I am no longer going to do so. Sincerely, RGone...1:o Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BessenOlli Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 Well.... but you know that there is a problem with the timings. Maybe someone can tell me some possible ways to solve this problem. would be useful. thx Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dippyskoodlez Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 Originally posted by BessenOlli Well.... but you know that there is a problem with the timings. Maybe someone can tell me some possible ways to solve this problem. would be useful. thx Can you check a different mobo, and run it at 200mhz with the set timings? what is the rated, and what are you trying to run? Info is good. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BessenOlli Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 With the Beta Bios from Jan 21st is worked. 2600+ (locked) @ 200 FSB Mushik RAM 2x256 in the bios from up to down: 3 2 2 3 2.0 ^^ SHOULD work. Now I have 4 3 3 4 2.0 ...because faster timing doesnt work with june19th bios. (not at FSB > 170.... wehen set it dowsnt boot or it boots and windows doesnt start, no start screen of windows)) PS: water cooled B) no temp problems. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BessenOlli Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 Hello? WOuld be great if someone could help me. Is this a Bios problem or something else? thx Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
slavik Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 if you do a procedure a certain way, it IS your way (if it's unique or you become well known for it) for example, who invented the GUI (Graphical User Interface)? do you know? Originally posted by RGone ...RGone...does not have a method. RGone ran some tests on his personal board and did it X way. That is all. I reported what I did. It does not make it RGone...'s way. Maybe not even a way. From here on out I am evaluating how I am going to post. It is very likely that I will be testing but there will be no post of the results. I am not going to post in speed results or give any benchmark results. There are too many people who think because I can do it or in fact do do whatever that they can do it. That is not so. I tested the CH-5 just to see what it would do. Not what anyone else would 'surely' do. It was an exercise in what "might" possibly if the stars were in alignment>be done by someone else. Not a sure thing by any means. So when it becomes RGone...'s way that is going to get someone past 200FSB that is a result of settings probably and not the bios at all> it is time for RGone... to change his posting procedure. I think there will be no more posting that in anyway can be mis-construed as my way. You guys do it the recommended way. I am not going to post results so there will be no way to mis-think. Let the average forum user post results if they desire> I am no longer going to do so. Sincerely, RGone...1:o Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAE Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 Originally posted by BessenOlli With the Beta Bios from Jan 21st is worked. 2600+ (locked) @ 200 FSB Mushik RAM 2x256 in the bios from up to down: 3 2 2 3 2.0 ^^ SHOULD work. Now I have 4 3 3 4 2.0 ...because faster timing doesnt work with june19th bios. (not at FSB > 170.... wehen set it dowsnt boot or it boots and windows doesnt start, no start screen of windows)) PS: water cooled B) no temp problems. Hey Olli. Did you read the "important info" post on top of this forums? There's the reasons why we need to see a detailed signature from you. Please do it so we can help you. As I can see from your timings above that seems a lil too hard for the ram sticks/northbridge to run TRAS=4!!! Please set it to 9...12. That should stabilize things. Erm, then what kinda Mushkin do ya have??? There are too much to guess! You should be able to run these timings at 200MHz (if your Mushkin is Special 2-2-2 3200 or 3500 Lvl 2: 11-2-2-2-2.0-12-15-enabled-enabled-fast-enabled (maybe disabled at higher clocks, =CPC option). So please get ya a sig Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BessenOlli Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 Sorry, now I have the infos @ my sig. On the RAMs there is written: "PC 3500 LevelOne 2:3:3 DDR" Now... what exactly should i set in the bios? ... but i could swear it always worked @ 3 2 2 3 2.0 with a 200MHz FSB. weird Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAE Posted June 30, 2004 Posted June 30, 2004 Originally posted by BessenOlli Sorry, now I have the infos @ my sig. On the RAMs there is written: "PC 3500 LevelOne 2:3:3 DDR" Now... what exactly should i set in the bios? ... but i could swear it always worked @ 3 2 2 3 2.0 with a 200MHz FSB. weird Please try the following: (set this order in bios too) 11 3 3 2 2.0 12 15 enabled enabled fast disabled (try enabled if everything works well) auto (7x additional timings in 2-17 alpha and later) drv str/slew rate auto (3x each) Ram voltage at 2.9V. Vdd at 1.6V. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.