Bosco Posted May 17, 2007 Posted May 17, 2007 http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1758865 What do you guys think was the person actually laying underneath the train? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fireonice Posted May 17, 2007 Posted May 17, 2007 It would explan the moving of the camera . I think he was but idk there is probably enof room to lay down but the train didnt even try to slow down.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdingeling Posted May 17, 2007 Posted May 17, 2007 holy smokes, if that's really a guy under a train.... That'd scare the crap outta me! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMeeD Posted May 17, 2007 Posted May 17, 2007 (edited) This was on digg not too long ago. One of the comments had an explanation that made sense. The guy has the camera attached to a pole, he is standing under a bridge with the camera stuck up between the rail ties. Even if thats wrong, I really dont think he could be under the train. You couldnt turn the camera around like that without either getting up or having the camera in your face especially with the way the tracks come together. Edited May 17, 2007 by SMeeD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze_Badger Posted May 17, 2007 Posted May 17, 2007 Haven't watched the video yet, but I'm assuming it's some guy under a train? Yea, that's possible. A few months ago in NYC, some guy saved someone in the subway when they had a seizure and fell on the tracks by laying ontop of them and getting them between the tracks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flareback Posted May 17, 2007 Posted May 17, 2007 This was on digg not too long ago. One of the comments had an explanation that made sense. The guy has the camera attached to a pole, he is standing under a bridge with the camera stuck up between the rail ties. Even if thats wrong, I really dont think he could be under the train. You couldnt turn the camera around like that without either getting up or having the camera in your face especially with the way the tracks come together. that explanation makes sense. I don't think you could turn the camera like that and not see part of his body. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClayMeow Posted May 18, 2007 Posted May 18, 2007 Definitely NOT lying under the train. Yes, you CAN definitely lie under a train (not that I've tried it personally), but I know there IS enough clearance for (most) people to fit. However, as mentioned, there is absolutely no way a person lying down could rotate the camera like that. It is feasibly impossible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze_Badger Posted May 18, 2007 Posted May 18, 2007 Nor would he be able to hide his body like that either . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClayMeow Posted May 18, 2007 Posted May 18, 2007 Nor would he be able to hide his body like that either . Well that's what I mean...he COULD feasibly hide his body if he kept the camera still, but once the camera rotates, that's not possible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze_Badger Posted May 18, 2007 Posted May 18, 2007 When he turned the camera, his body still wasn't visible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClayMeow Posted May 18, 2007 Posted May 18, 2007 When he turned the camera, his body still wasn't visible. Have you suddenly lost the ability to read English? Please read my posts again Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kamikaze_Badger Posted May 18, 2007 Posted May 18, 2007 Nah, I can read it... but comprehension is another thing . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now