BarneyGumble Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 And so was Martha Stewart Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznit Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 LOL, heaven forbid that Frist would could ever possibly doing anything wrong. Authorities are looking into Frist's recent sale of shares of hospital operator HCA Inc., co-founded by Frist's father and brother. The sales took place just days before HCA's stock price fell on a disappointing July 13 profit outlook. Sure looks suspiciously like he acted on some inside information to me. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks, there's a pretty good chance you are looking at a duck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nodgiles Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 lol your bringing bill clinton into this? thats hilarious. Clinton lied about .. .! . has nothing to do with how well you run a country. If I was the most powerfull person in the world Id lie about my sexual escapades as well. Who wouldnt? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
94Camaro Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 lol your bringing bill clinton into this? thats hilarious. Clinton lied about .. .! . has nothing to do with how well you run a country. 559708[/snapback] But a lie about something like . is a pretty good indication of a man's character (or lack thereof) now isn't it? And lying under oath is called perjury. That's a crime in itself and is what the impeachment was about. Not who he had . with. And it says they are LOOKING INTO the sale of stock. What if he simply chose a bad time to sell? Oh wait, he's a republican in a position of power. Maybe we should just lock him up. Screw due process. IF he did do something wrong, I'm not going to defend him, but some of you people are too ready to get the torches and pitch forks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybergrunt69 Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 Just for something to stir up the flames a bit... WTF is the big deal about making such an issue out of the political party? It's starting to sound almost as heated as judging a person based on gender/race/height/age/etc. So what if it's a "Republican" on trial? It's just another freaking politician. They are all the same, they just lie different ways, depending on who's paying them. It would be funny if you re-wrote 90% of these posts, replacing "Republican" with (take your pick): black, white, male, female, Indian, senior citizen, mail room worker, janitor, or race car driver. Hmmm, almost makes the political zealots flame yourself, doesn't it? In this particular case, it really shouldn't matter what this guy's political affiliation is. He's just somebody who got caught (I mean noticed, no, wait I mean accused) breaking the law. Hmmm, a stock sale right before the value crashes could be a coincidence, but since it's a company co-founded by his dad and brother, that goes way beyond 'just looking odd.' I think I see a duck! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoArmistead Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 In this particular case, it really shouldn't matter what this guy's political affiliation is. 559713[/snapback] Is there another case where it should matter what his political affiliation is? Normally, political affiliation would not be brought up, but since the whole premise of this topic, started by Aristotle, the anti-conservative, was to jump on the liberal bandwagon and bash two republicans who have been "indicted" on criminal charges...I think political affiliation has EVERYTHING to do with this topic, but should not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
swifty11212 Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 And so was Martha Stewart 559703[/snapback] poor martha, she "cooked" books with the wrong ingrediants and now shes a gangsta anyways we republicans are the underdogs, the democrats are the corrupted evil guys trying to kill us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoArmistead Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 poor martha, she "cooked" books with the wrong ingrediants and now shes a gangsta anyways we republicans are the underdogs, the democrats are the corrupted evil guys trying to kill us. 559777[/snapback] I think that whole Martha ordeal was bogus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
swifty11212 Posted October 13, 2005 Posted October 13, 2005 you should have heard the martha parodies on the radio here, laughed my @$$ off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristotle Posted October 15, 2005 Posted October 15, 2005 Lol! Who says I am anti-conservative? I just thought it was funny that so far two of the most widely recognized (and controversial) republicans are being investigated. The only reason it appears that Bill Frist was investigated and discovered was because of his close ties with Tom DeLay. My post had nothing to do with "jumping on the liberal bandwagon". I also never said they were guilty either. You assume way too much LoArmistead Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovek Posted October 15, 2005 Posted October 15, 2005 Aristotle, havnt you heard, it took three or four grand jurys just to indict DeLay, Not to mention the fact that the guy idicting DeLay has a big history of indicting people he didnt agree with. Besides I havn't heard a word of this outside of this thread, even out of the liberal media, I find little to no truth to this story. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoArmistead Posted October 15, 2005 Posted October 15, 2005 Lol! Who says I am anti-conservative? I just thought it was funny that so far two of the most widely recognized (and controversial) republicans are being investigated. The only reason it appears that Bill Frist was investigated and discovered was because of his close ties with Tom DeLay. My post had nothing to do with "jumping on the liberal bandwagon". I also never said they were guilty either. You assume way too much LoArmistead 560548[/snapback] Heh, you didn't say it, but it doesn't take a Plato to understand what you were insinuating. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now