txtiggerr Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 (edited) what is up witht he two cores and what is the difference? 3500 Venice and 3700 San Diego same specs? exept for the cache? WTF? From what I see you pay $68 more for the extra 512MB of L2 and lose SSE3 WTF? Edited May 11, 2005 by txtiggerr Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Goonie Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 512kb Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigred Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 no you don't loose sse3. in amd's eyes 200mhz and 512k of cache are going to give the same performance. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Silenc3 Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 512mb cache, cant wait for the day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alown Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 haha you saw it too Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
txtiggerr Posted May 11, 2005 Posted May 11, 2005 Newegg has them both listed as 2.2 Ghz so I guess you just are paying for extra cache? Same mem controller as Venice? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.