Wayway Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 I would think that you would get a little higher in am3 with sli, but I may be wrong. 417041[/snapback] i think its more on the cpu bottlenecking , but hey im on the front page on 3dmark03 and i made it to the hall of fame as soon as it gets updated.... http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Inde...b/projectsearch Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuclear Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 LOL, I haven't checked the ORB in a while...but I see 2 VO members in the Top 10 UDTSeal and Shogan are there now, Sik and I will be there shortly. We already have some 25K runs down, just need to upload and get them approved. Good Job Way, let me know if I can help. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerm Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 I would think that you would get a little higher in am3 with sli, but I may be wrong. 417041[/snapback] same here! I would have expected much higher in AM3 with SLI but congrats on the front page 03 score. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayway Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 thanks guys im now 19 on the hall of fame im going for higher now im runnin: http://www.futuremark.com/community/halloffame/ 265x10=2.65 htt=3x ram is @ 3-4-4-8 1t @2.8volts cpu is @ max on this board need more volts help if u know a software to do this drivers 66.93 @ 410/1100 will raise up some more and see. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuclear Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 The Neo4 cannot give more than 1.65v without a hardware mod. You need to solder a 20K VR to the pwm ic. With the mod, you can run up to around 1.85v before a OVP mod is needed. Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Overclockersdream Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 why do most people in 3dmark03 run there computer settings at 1024x768 @ 32 bit?? arent you supposed to run the max on everything? for instance 1280x1024 @ 32 bit should be the settings or am i wrong? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbone2sk Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 No, you run all benchmarks at the stock settings that they give you. That is the standard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayway Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 u know where i can find this guide to do this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Overclockersdream Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 but your allowed to change the settings!!? alot of ppl change the settings some ppl only do the FPS test, and completely ignore the Sound test. i run all my test on 1280x1024!! i dunno i just dont get, but thx for the quick reply Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbone2sk Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 ok when the bench starts up run it at default settings, than the score is only made up from the game test. So if you have the full version then all you have to do is run the game tests. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigr5026 Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3679993, ul kill him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ostate21 Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3679993, ul kill him 417092[/snapback] LOL thats great! That had to take so time to finsh that! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now