GmAz Posted October 23, 2004 Posted October 23, 2004 First off, I know that jsut casue one person gets a good OC, doesn't mean I will get the same thing. I just wanna see what the "average" OC is on my hardware. Mainly on the: K8N Neo Platinum mobo with the NForce 3 250GB chipset and AMD 3200+ 64bit Proc. What is your guys numbers, and you can also reply if you have a different board. I am runnin Geil PC3200 Ultra Dragon Ram. I know, the PC3200 is probably gonna hold me back, but hey, it OC'd my old Barton real well. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerm Posted October 23, 2004 Posted October 23, 2004 well most people that I know of are getting about 2.4ghz on 3200(clawhammer's) and about 2.6ghz on 3200(newcastle's) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Posted October 23, 2004 Posted October 23, 2004 I can hit 2.6 on my newcastle but my ram is a little unstable at that speed. @ 2.5 i'm rock stable. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmac Posted October 23, 2004 Posted October 23, 2004 (edited) what do u have? i think the cg is better for ocing then the co. ( if im wrong someone plz correct me) thanks nerm for correcting me dont want to give out bad info cmac Edited October 23, 2004 by cmac Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Posted October 23, 2004 Posted October 23, 2004 CG is the better of the two, but what confuses me is that for my 3200+ newcastle, it says stepping as "0" and Revision as "DH7-CG" so i'm not sure If I have a C0 or CG chip. lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmac Posted October 23, 2004 Posted October 23, 2004 mine says the same thing stepping o revis dh7-cg (mine is the 3000) cmac Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerm Posted October 23, 2004 Posted October 23, 2004 This post has been edited by myself due to a major brain fart on my part. lmao Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GmAz Posted October 23, 2004 Posted October 23, 2004 thx ya'll. ALso, my CPU-Z tells me i have the DH7-CG revision. On my chip, is this the stepping: CBAEC. Man, I feel like such a noob. Been busy at work and havent had much time ot keep up on the 64bit stuff. Althoug in CPU-Z, it sys my stepping is also 0. Model C, Ext. Model C, Family F and Ext. Family F. Hmmmm. How you find out if you have a clawhammer or newcastle? Do newcastle have the 512K Cache and clawhammer have the 1mb cache? And my current stable OC is in my Sig pic. {{EDIT}} I am a big nerd, it tells me newcastle in teh freaking CPU-Z Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eva_Unit_0 Posted October 23, 2004 Posted October 23, 2004 Byron I thought all Newcastle's were CO stepping, and BTW CO's are supposed to OC better than the CG's. But anway I am 99% sure all Newcastle's are CO stepping. Other way around. The CG's overclock better than the C0's, and you're right that ALMOST all newcastles are CG's. The C0 steppings are chips that are actually clawhammers but have some of their cache disabled (these are the very early newcastle chips) while the CG stepping chips are a "true" newcastle with only 512k of cache in the first place. I have a C0 newcastle 3000+, and it can hit 2.5 rock solid, about 2.6ghz max with some instabality. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Posted October 23, 2004 Posted October 23, 2004 Well I was half right :-P I've been wondering about this for a while. But the previous owner of this cpu/mb sayed he could get it to 2.7 ish. I just need some better ram, because my pc-3200 cant push 260fsb or higher fsb without losing its stability. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GmAz Posted October 25, 2004 Posted October 25, 2004 The C0 steppings are chips that are actually clawhammers but have some of their cache disabled (these are the very early newcastle chips) while the CG stepping chips are a "true" newcastle with only 512k of cache in the first place. Is there a way to "re-enable" the extra cache? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForgottenBHS Posted March 31, 2005 Posted March 31, 2005 I know it's an amd thread but... i get a 1.92 GHz overclock w/ my P4 northwood 2.8c ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.