Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
d3bruts1d

Super Pi

Recommended Posts

It was requested that we have a "Super Pi" thread similar to the other benchmark "Post Your Score" threads. Since Super Pi doesn't have a "score" well be posting our times in this thread.

 

 

What This Thread Is For:

For OCC members to post and brag about their Super Pi times. Having all the scores in one place should help other see where their system compares to other similar systems.

 

Guidelines:

1- One post per person in this thread. - If you upgrade or get a different benchmark, edit your post.

2- This is for Super Pi times only.

3- If you wish to discuss a system, time, etc start a new thread.

4- Try and make the most of this by running some of the same results (or all) that you see others doing.

 

Example:

000h 00m 00s [ 16k]

000h 00m 20s [ 512k]

000h 03m 44s [ 4M]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh man, I can't believe you are asking us to do this, D3!!!!

Do you realize how much time this takes away from folding????? :D

 

Wow - it sure is odd how much difference a little processor speed makes...

 

P3M----------Size-------AMD1800

@1 GHz-----------------1.54 GHz

------------------------------------------------------

00m 08s-----[128K]-----00m 05s

00m 23s-----[256K]-----00m 14s

01m 04s-----[512K]-----00m 32s

02m 21s-----[1M]--------01m 13s

05m 13s-----[2M]--------02m 47s

11m 22s-----[4M]--------06m 01s

ya right -----[8M]--------13m 08s <----------- this is gettin embarrasing...

years--------[16M]-------28m 41s

heck no -----[32M]--01h 03m 23s <----------- trying to ignore r_target and Eva_Unit

 

I dunno how accurate this thing is. I just ran this on another machine I use (not mine), and the 512k test took 50sec. It's a dual Xeon 1.8 (with HT - shows 4cpu) with 4GB ECC ram. Zero OC'ing. what the heck?????

Edited by cybergrunt69

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

01s [ 32k ]

02s [ 64k ]

05s [ 128k ]

16s [ 256k ]

42s [ 512k ]

1m44s [1m]

4m57s [2m]

 

 

Celeron 2.0 @2.66

Eeek, my celeron seems to suck at this. 128kL2 maybe?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my first go, with the A64 at 2200mhz. I'm sure I can get these lower with some more tuning/tweaking/overclocking, but I figured I'd at least get something out there. The first two were 00:00, so they aren't shown, lol...at I didn't feel like waiting for the last two. Maybe I'll let them finish some other time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to keep downclocking my computer, [email protected] and Pi together kept causing my system to almost crash. AC was turned down last night.

 

Edit: remember, D3 said to post only once, but you can edit you post as much as you want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

000h 00m 00s [16K]

000h 00m 00s [32K]

000h 00m 01s [64K]

000h 00m 03s [128K]

000h 00m 08s [256K]

000h 00m 18s [512K]

000h 00m 41s [1M]

000h 01m 34s [2M]

000h 03m 33s [4M]

000h 07m 28s [8M]

000h 16m 14s [16M]

000h 35m 01s [32M]

 

*shrug* acceptable I suppose

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dunno how accurate this thing is. I just ran this on another machine I use (not mine), and the 512k test took 50sec. It's a dual Xeon 1.8 (with HT - shows 4cpu) with 4GB ECC ram. Zero OC'ing. what the heck?????

This program only takes advantage of one CPU

 

FX-53

 

ScreenHunter_001.jpg

Edited by Paranoid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my 2500+

 

- Not calculated. [ 16K]

- Not calculated. [ 32K]

+ 000h 00m 01s [ 64K]

+ 000h 00m 03s [ 128K]

+ 000h 00m 08s [ 256K]

+ 000h 00m 21s [ 512K]

+ 000h 00m 48s [ 1M]

+ 000h 01m 50s [ 2M]

+ 000h 04m 01s [ 4M]

+ 000h 08m 50s [ 8M]

+ 000h 19m 36s [ 16M]

+ 000h 42m 57s [ 32M]

 

 

my 500 mhz Celeron

 

+ 000h 00m 01s [ 16K]

+ 000h 00m 03s [ 32K]

+ 000h 00m 10s [ 64K]

+ 000h 00m 24s [ 128K]

+ 000h 01m 00s [ 256K]

+ 000h 02m 21s [ 512K]

+ 000h 05m 26s [ 1M]

+ 000h 12m 29s [ 2M]

+ 000h 26m 39s [ 4M]

+ 000h 56m 22s [ 8M]

+ 001h 57m 44s [ 16M]

+ 004h 41m 36s [ 32M]

 

dang, that one took forever :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...