r_target Posted June 24, 2004 Posted June 24, 2004 I think the 3.2EE could beat my OC'ed 2.4c, and this is what I get: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampire Posted June 24, 2004 Posted June 24, 2004 I get over 11k with my 2.8c @ 3.5, does this mean my CPU is better than the 3.2EE? No. It doesnt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord_Pistachio Posted June 24, 2004 Posted June 24, 2004 Hyper Threaded, we are talking about OCed 2600+ vs NORMAL 3.2EE, if you actually read something (besides title) you'd know that so read and post intelligent remarks with some actually sign of thought behind them instead of just throwing . out of the keyboard of yours. You dont need to insult everyone and act like your Mr.king ., he asked a question let him get his answers. It doesn't matter if the 3.2EE is normal. He's still right. The Barton 2600+ costs $90, and the 3.2EE is almost $1000. No amount of overclocking can get a 2600+ to equoal a 3.2EE. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k1e1v1i1n Posted June 24, 2004 Posted June 24, 2004 isnt it weird how ppl get mad about this stuff personaly i think it could beat it in the right hands but i wouldnt know cause i dont have a 2600+ or a p4ee Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCC10281982B Posted June 24, 2004 Posted June 24, 2004 Seems that indivigual milage varies with this. I didn't know you could run an xp @ 2.8 or more. Besides this battle makes for intresting Maximum pc atricles. EDIT: btw, Isn't this an AMD vs INTEL tpye of thing??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KraZy Posted June 24, 2004 Posted June 24, 2004 You guys have lost me in the comparison here. P4EE vs OC'd 2600? 1. You can't make judgments on what your friend, boss or anyone else says. Dunno how many times I heard in this thread 'Yeah? Well my friend said.....' 2. Sorry. But you can't make comparisons based on the static values in Sandra. Too many variables involved. 3. Both processors have thier strengths and weeknesses. And btw, looking at MHz alone won't tell you jack. For the average guy like myself, we need to stick with real-world performance, and not the benchmarks. 4. Chances are, even if alot of the people here have actually tested this out themselves, which I know they haven't (with the exception of a gifted few), wont be chanting 'AMD is better' or vice-versa. Sorry, had to get it out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazwegion Posted June 25, 2004 Posted June 25, 2004 You desire to see screen shots eh? <_< Behold the POWER of the OC'ed Retro system... I achieved a massive 'performance boost' by adding this decal Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowPaktu Posted June 25, 2004 Posted June 25, 2004 lol, nice scores (although you coulda matched the font better and used a gradient fill) But still, nearly perfect Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazwegion Posted June 25, 2004 Posted June 25, 2004 lol, nice scores (although you coulda matched the font better and used a gradient fill) But still, nearly perfect Hey... you try and do it in MS-Paint LMAO Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stitch_626 Posted June 25, 2004 Posted June 25, 2004 Try adding a "Type R" decal and see how fast it goes!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FxXP Posted June 25, 2004 Posted June 25, 2004 Anyone wasting money on 32 bit Intel CPU's is making me laugh, especially the EE's. When XP-64 hits the shelves.. you'll look back on the money you wasted. Intel for the rich braggers, AMD for those that believe in the future. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AYoKoNA Posted June 25, 2004 Posted June 25, 2004 Anyone wasting money on 32 bit Intel CPU's is making me laugh, especially the EE's. When XP-64 hits the shelves.. you'll look back on the money you wasted. Intel for the rich braggers, AMD for those that believe in the future. Ummm yea ..... sure... This is coming from someone who has a 2500+ When Xp-64 comes out on shelves, you can be sure to see a 64bit Intel CPU as well. Why is it a waste of money? Even when 64bit apps and software comes out, its not like 32bit CPU's are gonna be scrapped and obsolete as soon as they hit the shelves... You act like you won't be able to use the machine anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts