Bosco Posted August 19, 2002 Posted August 19, 2002 It isn't that great Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted August 19, 2002 Posted August 19, 2002 wouldn't go on the same post sorry guys Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted August 19, 2002 Posted August 19, 2002 <_> Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted August 19, 2002 Posted August 19, 2002 <_> Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted August 19, 2002 Posted August 19, 2002 done Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psywar Posted August 19, 2002 Posted August 19, 2002 it is and it isent.. it still wh00ped the Nvidia.. by 10pts on most or something.. oh well Nvidia 4 Life f00! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted August 19, 2002 Posted August 19, 2002 Ya but the way everyone has been bragging they were making it sound like a MX against a 4600TI as far as I am concerned they are just blowing alot of smoke like usual. That is not a very big difference to be saying your going to have control of the graphic industry. I guess will just wait and see nVidia put them in their place as usual. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATI Radeon 8500 Posted August 19, 2002 Posted August 19, 2002 It seemed to do a lot better in 3DMark though...I never noticed the Parhelia sucked that much! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
d3bruts1d Posted August 19, 2002 Posted August 19, 2002 Ya, the Perhelia blows. Those benchmarks aren't that great. :/ And for such an uber l33t r0x0r card, it should have blown away the GF4ti.... but it didn't, which brings be back to the orrigional point. ATI sucks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted August 19, 2002 Posted August 19, 2002 Ya, the Perhelia blows. Those benchmarks aren't that great. :/ And for such an uber l33t r0x0r card, it should have blown away the GF4ti.... but it didn't, which brings be back to the orrigional point. ATI sucks. I agree Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Citation4444 Posted August 21, 2002 Posted August 21, 2002 As a newcomer, it's obvious we've got a seriously biased admin in Bosco. Posts phony benchmarks on GF5, and selective reports on reviews of the 9700 Pro vs GF4 Ti4600. If he'd really read and understood the many reviews that have hit the net, it would be obvious that the 9700 Pro blows away the current GF4 card. By a healthy margin, especially when using FSAA and anisotropic filtering. Some of the reviews show a margin of over 3X. Bosco, you have no credibility. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted August 21, 2002 Posted August 21, 2002 As a newcomer, it's obvious we've got a seriously biased admin in Bosco. Posts phony benchmarks on GF5, and selective reports on reviews of the 9700 Pro vs GF4 Ti4600. If he'd really read and understood the many reviews that have hit the net, it would be obvious that the 9700 Pro blows away the current GF4 card. By a healthy margin, especially when using FSAA and anisotropic filtering. Some of the reviews show a margin of over 3X. Bosco, you have no credibility. And you do after one post please <_> Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now