Pteroduck Posted April 29, 2012 Posted April 29, 2012 MSI GTX 560 TI 2gb --->http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127608 OR GTX 680 4gb when it comes out? im currently running 1920x1080p playing games like bf3+sc2, i'd like some opinions here SLI or NOT? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rofltroll Posted April 29, 2012 Posted April 29, 2012 (edited) What is it with you and SLI? You will see a hell of a lot more performance out of a 680. If you can really afford a 680, then I suggest you get it. Edit: and stop creating so many threads. Edited April 29, 2012 by Rofltroll Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pteroduck Posted April 30, 2012 Posted April 30, 2012 I'm just asking man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted April 30, 2012 Posted April 30, 2012 1920x1080 doesn't need 4 GB of RAM. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MandoPatriot Posted May 1, 2012 Posted May 1, 2012 1920x1080 doesn't need 4 GB of RAM. On Skyrim with all the textures mod and what not it is needed... My 570 is at 1250mb and Skyrim wants to use waaayyyy over that. 1920x1080. I get stuttering outside when it reaches the limit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nyt Posted May 1, 2012 Posted May 1, 2012 On Crysis 2 at 1920x1080 maxed, I used up all 1.5Gb on my GTX580 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted May 1, 2012 Posted May 1, 2012 On Skyrim with all the textures mod and what not it is needed... My 570 is at 1250mb and Skyrim wants to use waaayyyy over that. 1920x1080. I get stuttering outside when it reaches the limit. 2 GB should be enough though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nyt Posted May 1, 2012 Posted May 1, 2012 2 GB should be enough though. +1 , I didnt even touch the full 2Gb's of my 6970 at 1920x1080 games maxed out 3Gb or 4Gb cards are really for 2560x1600 else they are overkill Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyper Posted May 1, 2012 Posted May 1, 2012 +1 , I didnt even touch the full 2Gb's of my 6970 at 1920x1080 games maxed out 3Gb or 4Gb cards are really for 2560x1600 else they are overkill What's wrong with overkill? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nyt Posted May 1, 2012 Posted May 1, 2012 What's wrong with overkill? You waste money that you could've spent on something else that gives you more performance. If you only use 1.5Gb max and get a 4Gb card instead of 2Gb, you wont get any performance over the 2Gb card for the extra $100 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyper Posted May 1, 2012 Posted May 1, 2012 I'd rather have too much then too little... If you swap out your gfx cards every 6months or so it wouldnt matter as much, on the other hand if you want to use them for a couple years... better longevity with the ones with more ram.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waco Posted May 1, 2012 Posted May 1, 2012 What's wrong with overkill? Did you really just ask Nyt that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now