gotdamojo06 Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 2 i7, 1 atom, and soon 1 Brisbane Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanTheGamer11 Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 AMD FTW! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest_Jim_* Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 Intel's integrated is improving, and for a laptop all you should really look for is whether it can handle any type of video file. Gaming on a laptop is a money pit and a battery whore  With Sandbridge, AMD doesn't really have too much price/performance anymore. They did pre-SB but now most of their top-end stuff has been beaten. Even some of the lowend HT'd dual core i3s can beat the Athlon II quads in most things. Not all that glitters is gold, nor is all that needs 3D acceleration a game I used to use a program called World Wind and others, I've never had an Intel IGP to deal with, had major issues with them to the point that they simply could not use the program. The reason was that they had very poor 3D capabilities. As I stated earlier though, this was several years ago (4-5 years). Granted, SB may be better at price/performance (I'm haven't been following CPUs much lately, as I'm good with my current one), but those represent a new generation. I'm unsure of the Thuban based Phenoms but the non-Thuban are based on a core what, two years old now? As I said, I haven't been following CPUs now, so correct me if I'm wrong, but Phenom II vs Sandy Bridge is also comparing different generations, with SB the newer, so the results should be skewed. Eh, doesn't really matter to me anyway. It'll probably be a year or more before I'd build another rig and by then we'll have Ivy Bridge or what's after that, and a second gen Bulldozer, at least. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVIYTH0S Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 Not all that glitters is gold, nor is all that needs 3D acceleration a game I used to use a program called World Wind and others, I've never had an Intel IGP to deal with, had major issues with them to the point that they simply could not use the program. The reason was that they had very poor 3D capabilities. As I stated earlier though, this was several years ago (4-5 years). Granted, SB may be better at price/performance (I'm haven't been following CPUs much lately, as I'm good with my current one), but those represent a new generation. I'm unsure of the Thuban based Phenoms but the non-Thuban are based on a core what, two years old now? As I said, I haven't been following CPUs now, so correct me if I'm wrong, but Phenom II vs Sandy Bridge is also comparing different generations, with SB the newer, so the results should be skewed. Eh, doesn't really matter to me anyway. It'll probably be a year or more before I'd build another rig and by then we'll have Ivy Bridge or what's after that, and a second gen Bulldozer, at least. I see, yeah I mean because the high end phenoms encroach into Sandybridge pricing while getting delivering less performance, so the generation differences are null . Â The Athlon IIs, specifically the quads, still are a force to be reckoned with while easily attainable at $60 with not too much effort. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deathmineral Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 I see, yeah I mean because the high end phenoms encroach into Sandybridge pricing while getting delivering less performance, so the generation differences are null . Â The Athlon IIs, specifically the quads, still are a force to be reckoned with while easily attainable at $60 with not too much effort. You know that goes both ways right? E8500 and 1100T, both $200, performance not so much the same. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gebraset Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 Using AMD right now, just because that was what was offered with my system in stores. Would have went Intel if I could, and certainly will next time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MercuryDoun Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 I use both, but Intel is in my Main rig, so i went with that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVIYTH0S Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 You know that goes both ways right? E8500 and 1100T, both $200, performance not so much the same. Oh don't rev me up on how much 775 is overpriced!! lol  Though I have to thank the screwed up market pricing for making my move to i7 essentially free Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bp9801 Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 AMD in both the desktop and laptop. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bgnatewv2 Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 Good ole AMD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
medbor Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 Intel (but not happy about it), going amd next time no matter what! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccokeman Posted May 29, 2011 Posted May 29, 2011 Sadly there is no both option but I voted for Intel but I have both systems set up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts