Wolfrider Posted January 29, 2011 Posted January 29, 2011 Back to the processors, when I look to the game benchmarks, the intel i7 beats the 1900T so bad... Correct me if I'm wrong, but it does matter witch processor you have. For example COD 6: http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/intel_corei7_2600k_and_corei5_2500k/11.htm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krieg1337 Posted January 29, 2011 Posted January 29, 2011 Back to the processors, when I look to the game benchmarks, the intel i7 beats the 1900T so bad... Correct me if I'm wrong, but it does matter witch processor you have. For example COD 6: http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/intel_corei7_2600k_and_corei5_2500k/11.htm Those are benchmarks to compare the actual strength of each CPU, which is only when the GPU is not being stressed. If you played at lowest settings then yes it would matter. But when you play @ 1920x1200 then it doesn't matter http://www.guru3d.com/article/phenom-ii-x6-1055t-1090t-review/16 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanTheGamer11 Posted January 29, 2011 Posted January 29, 2011 Also, I read that AMD is producing new processors, x8 and x16 ( two x8 in one chip) schould I wait? those probably bulldozer so 942 pin mobo aka am3+ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfrider Posted January 29, 2011 Posted January 29, 2011 Also, it seems that extra DRAM doesn't boost performance in games, but I like to game 3D (red/blue), does that need more dram or is it completely useless to buy more than 4gigs RAM? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanTheGamer11 Posted January 29, 2011 Posted January 29, 2011 also according to a website they said it was 50% faster than and intel 980x or hinted at it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfrider Posted January 29, 2011 Posted January 29, 2011 Those are benchmarks to compare the actual strength of each CPU, which is only when the GPU is not being stressed. If you played at lowest settings then yes it would matter. But when you play @ 1920x1200 then it doesn't matter http://www.guru3d.com/article/phenom-ii-x6-1055t-1090t-review/16 does it matter to your gpu if you got a I7 or an x6? Since a better processor handles memory better, it should also improve the performance of a state of the art gpu Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfrider Posted January 29, 2011 Posted January 29, 2011 My theory is that the processor is more used if there is a very good gpu thats not stressed. for the gpu, i'm thinking of buying a HD 5970 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfrider Posted January 29, 2011 Posted January 29, 2011 I mean 5870 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanTheGamer11 Posted January 29, 2011 Posted January 29, 2011 Also, it seems that extra DRAM doesn't boost performance in games, but I like to game 3D (red/blue), does that need more dram or is it completely useless to buy more than 4gigs RAM? I think it's really the Video Cards job to render it in 3d so it uses much faster VRAM... I heard loads a games are staring to use more ram so... wait 4 person who plays actual games cause my pc is old... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UT66 Posted January 31, 2011 Posted January 31, 2011 the cheapest -no nerfed- dual @ quad core from intel you can find Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted January 31, 2011 Posted January 31, 2011 My theory is that the processor is more used if there is a very good gpu thats not stressed. for the gpu, i'm thinking of buying a HD 5970 I think you might be a little confused about what stressed means when it comes to computers. The lower the resolution the more CPU bound the computer is when it comes to gaming. As you start to go up in resolutions the more stress gets put on the Video Card and less on the CPU. So for example 800X600 is almost 100% dependent on the CPU, where as 2560X1600 (30" LCD) is 100% Video card. 1680X1050 is roughly about 40% CPU and 60% Video if I remember correctly, and 1920X1200 is 20% and 80% give or take. Sometimes the way games are coded can affect what I just said and go more CPU or Video based depending on the games coding but if its coded the way it should be what I said about % would be fairly close. Hopefully that gives you a better idea. If gaming is your thing get at least a Quad Core, and if you like the idea of the 1090T there is nothing wrong with a little future proofing. Hope that helps you a little. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVIYTH0S Posted January 31, 2011 Posted January 31, 2011 I think you might be a little confused about what stressed means when it comes to computers. The lower the resolution the more CPU bound the computer is when it comes to gaming. As you start to go up in resolutions the more stress gets put on the Video Card and less on the CPU. So for example 800X600 is almost 100% dependent on the CPU, where as 2560X1600 (30" LCD) is 100% Video card. 1680X1050 is roughly about 40% CPU and 60% Video if I remember correctly, and 1920X1200 is 20% and 80% give or take. Sometimes the way games are coded can affect what I just said and go more CPU or Video based depending on the games coding but if its coded the way it should be what I said about % would be fairly close. Hopefully that gives you a better idea. If gaming is your thing get at least a Quad Core, and if you like the idea of the 1090T there is nothing wrong with a little future proofing. Hope that helps you a little. A better processor might help with multi gpu scaling though right?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now