Stuart Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 Like it says above Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARandomOWL Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 2x2GB. Less RAMs to worry about. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingdingeling Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 2x2GB, less sticks, less strain on the memory controller. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IVIYTH0S Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 2x2GB. Less RAMs to worry about. 2x2GB, less sticks, less strain on the memory controller. :thumbs-up: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizzlenitch Posted August 7, 2009 Posted August 7, 2009 2x2GB certainly the way to go. Leaves you room to throw another 4GB on the board in the future should the need so arise, as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glow of fire Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 Whichever is cheaper. Difference doesn't exist if you're using a 32 bit system(unless you count power savings). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xly15 Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 The 2x2GB kit. The reasons have already been said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 Whichever is cheaper. Difference doesn't exist if you're using a 32 bit system(unless you count power savings). Actually if you look at overclocking there is a big difference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kovoet Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 Definitely 2x2GB is the way to go. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccokeman Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 2x2gb 4x1 will work but adds additional latencies into the equation as well as making it more difficult for the memory controller. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
potatochobit Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 no one mentioned dual channel memory which is the real reason :thumbs-up: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccokeman Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 That is another reason Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now