ATi vs. nVidia
Posted 30 December 2003 - 07:30 PM
Posted 30 December 2003 - 07:34 PM
3200+ Winchester @ 2500mhz (250 x 10, 1:1)
1gb Geil Ultra PC4000
74gb Raptor/120gb Barracuda
Chieftec Green Dragon/Antec Truepower 430
Posted 30 December 2003 - 08:39 PM
Posted 30 December 2003 - 09:27 PM
Posted 30 December 2003 - 09:58 PM
I bought a 9000 Pro, had exactly the same problem. Possibly just the drivers. I was so disgusted that I returned it, and wrote as the reason "Hate it."
My GF3, on the other hand, has never let me down. I can play any game I have (or trial versions of new games that I don't own for that matter) at 1024x768x32 bit at full quality settings, with no problems at all. No slowdowns, no stutters. I get decent 3d2001marks as well. (6750 range with PC in sig)
For a while (actaully before the 7000) I had a GF4 MX420. Good card, decent benchmarks, but it didn't support hardware DVD decoding. At the time I was using my PC as a DVD player, connected to the TV. I wanted hardware decompression, so I eBay'ed it and get the 7000, which I found was good for 2-d but not so good for 3-d.
Just my experience, and why I'm still an nVidia fan.
Posted 30 December 2003 - 10:09 PM
Still I find all these "Look at the HL2 benchmarks!" posts kinda borked...It's like running benchamrks on Longhorn and saying "OMG! It's worse than Windows XP!"
The product isn't even out yet, you can't exactly take these HL2 benchmarks as the absolute true outcome. Sure, we all know Valve and ATi are all on eachothers jocks, of course HL2 will run better on an ATi card. Once Valve comes out with an official benchmark method rather than some leaked version of the game being tested, than I'll take those official benchmark numbers more seriously.
Back to OpenGL for a second: With Homeworld 2, crank up all those details and zoom in close on your battlecruisers and all those ships, the detail and graphics are awesome! Sure OpenGL is getting kind of old while we wait for OpenGL 2, but it can still produce great looking games and provide good performance as well.
For me personally, I've never played the original Half-Life, and never played CS, sure HL2 looks awesome on footage I've seen so far, but I'm more excited about the graphics engine rather than the game.
With my recent upgrade for X-Mas, went from my old Geforce 3 to the eVga 5900SE, and the upgrade is amazing. And for all you "SE" haters, SE in this case does not mean gimped. Still has the 256-bit and not 128 like the 5700's or the 9600's. Has the same 400mhz core as 5900's, and just has lower memory clocks at 700mhz. It came with full retail version of Call of Duty, and was priced total under $200. Was like $201.18 with tax and free shipping from NewEgg. Now I can crank up the res on the games I play and turn up the AA and AF. SWG looks awesome with 4xAA and 8xAF and runs smooth also. Halo doesn't support AA but with AA off I can keep the res cranked up. It was an awesome deal for under $200.
Basically my point with the last paragraph was that sure ATi makes a better performing card with the 9800's, but that doesn't mean nVidia's cards are crap either. Sure a Ferrari may be fast as hell, but it doesn't mean a Ford Mustang sucks because it's slower than the Ferrari.
Besides, by the time HL 2 and Doom 3 come out, ATI and nVidia will probably be close to cranking out the next best thing. Those R400's or whatever the number is will probably run HL2 a helluva lot better than 9800's, and the next core nVidia makes will probably erase some of the bad design decisions of the current core.
But believe what you will, I'm not saying ATi sux in any shape or form, I'm just saying just because nVidia might not have the fastest card in the world doesn't mean that they suck. Just like Jamal Lewis, the running back for the Balitmore Ravens, sure he didn't break Eric Dickerson's single season rushing record, doesn't mean he sucks just because he's not in 1st place, he still kicked .!
Posted 31 December 2003 - 10:12 AM
and finally a radeon 9000 vs a geforce 3 is not a fair fight. the 9000 was built by ati to run against the MX cards, not the higher end card. it's a stripped down 8500 (more so than the 8500LE). the 9100 and 9200 got a better memory controller to make up for the short comings of the 9000 and made a dramatic improvement to it.
Posted 31 December 2003 - 10:24 AM
a 7000? No wonder why it stuttered, it was the lowest end card from ATI at the time, and GTA 3 did require a bit of horsepower.
I'm still an nVidia fan, but that's because my last ATI card (a 7000) didn't impress me much. Maybe it was just the drivers, but I didn't like the way it stuttered in GTA3.
Posted 01 January 2004 - 07:59 AM
R 9800 pro. " i vote ATI"
Case:Cooler Master Sniper / Motherboard : ASUS ROG Maximus X hero (wi-fi)/ CPU: Intel Core i7 8086K / CPU HS:Corsair H100i V2
VGA: Nvidia 2080TI FE / Memory: Corsair vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 3600 / SSD's:Samsung 960 evo M.2 500 gig for OS + Samsung EVO 840 250g +WD Blue 500g
PSU: CoolMax 1200W / Monitor: Acer X34 @ 100 hz/ KB: CM Storm Trigger Z / Mouse: Razor Lachesis / OS: Windows 10 Home premium 64
Posted 01 January 2004 - 03:10 PM
Posted 05 January 2004 - 04:26 PM
ATi cards were cheaper then nVidia cards last time I checked.
,Jan 1 2004, 11:10 PM] hopefully Nvidia comes good next time becuase that is only for us the consumer, lower prices and better cards